From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <o.bektas@proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E157C606BB for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 13:14:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D540E3E7A for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 13:14:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id DB37D3E6E for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 13:14:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 87354404E1 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 13:14:22 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 13:14:20 +0100 From: Oguz Bektas <o.bektas@proxmox.com> To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> Message-ID: <YgzqnGpqS/uKhEMm@gaia> Mail-Followup-To: Oguz Bektas <o.bektas@proxmox.com>, Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> References: <20220211151547.181259-1-s.ivanov@proxmox.com> <20220211151547.181259-3-s.ivanov@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220211151547.181259-3-s.ivanov@proxmox.com> X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.631 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-kernel-meta v3 2/4] proxmox-boot: fix #3671 add pin/unpin for kernel-version X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 12:14:23 -0000 hi, just noticed it should be bug #3761 and not #3671, careful when applying this :)