From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <o.bektas@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEF727C281
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu,  4 Nov 2021 12:12:18 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C42091F08C
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu,  4 Nov 2021 12:12:18 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 2336B1F081
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu,  4 Nov 2021 12:12:18 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id EFC0046049
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu,  4 Nov 2021 12:12:17 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2021 12:12:15 +0100
From: Oguz Bektas <o.bektas@proxmox.com>
To: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Cc: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <YYPAD99smRmUk9db@gaia>
Mail-Followup-To: Oguz Bektas <o.bektas@proxmox.com>,
 Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>,
 Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
References: <20211014081916.575700-1-o.bektas@proxmox.com>
 <YYFIqSbJF4TlFCai@gaia>
 <32244938-3591-31c4-9016-60d1faf5c0bc@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <32244938-3591-31c4-9016-60d1faf5c0bc@proxmox.com>
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.867 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [archlinux.org]
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH v2 docs] pct: add section for supported
 distributions
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2021 11:12:18 -0000

On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 12:00:03PM +0100, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
> On 02.11.21 15:18, Oguz Bektas wrote:
> > any news for this?
> >
> not really, but not using asciidoc syntax for quotes was a reason that prevented me from applying it.

which syntax exactly?

if i do it like this:

"a lightweight and flexible Linux® distribution that tries to Keep It
Simple." -- https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Arch_Linux

it breaks the link in the rendered HTML page (it's not
highlighted or clickable). thats why i separated the links.

or do you mean something else?