From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a0f:8001:1:32::40])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20C801FF09C
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Mon, 02 Nov 2026 14:53:52 +0100 (CET)
Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 08CDC21806;
	Mon, 02 Nov 2026 14:53:49 +0100 (CET)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2026 14:53:42 +0100
Message-Id: <DMKRXEMU4NG6.UGN251ARE6KU@proxmox.com>
To: "Hannes Laimer" <h.laimer@proxmox.com>, <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH pve-manager v5 4/9] ui: sdn: add IPv6 RA / SLAAC support
From: "Lukas Sichert" <l.sichert@proxmox.com>
References: <20261029154148.2882594-1-h.laimer@proxmox.com>
 <20261029154148.2882594-5-h.laimer@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20261029154148.2882594-5-h.laimer@proxmox.com>
X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2
X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1793627622729
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
	AWL                     0.562 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From:
 address
	DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
	KAM_DMARC_STATUS         0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict
 Alignment (newer systems)
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
	SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
	SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Message-ID-Hash: UQO7QXIJVDHULMWQM6RGKL7IJQHXTQNV
X-Message-ID-Hash: UQO7QXIJVDHULMWQM6RGKL7IJQHXTQNV
X-MailFrom: l.sichert@proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop;
 banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation;
 administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation;
 no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:pve-devel-owner@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-join@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-leave@lists.proxmox.com>

On 2026-10-29 16:41, Hannes Laimer <h.laimer@proxmox.com> wrote:


> +    advancedItems: [
> +        {
> +            xtype: 'proxmoxintegerfield',
> +            name: 'ipv6-ra-router-lifetime',
> +            fieldLabel: gettext('Router Lifetime (s)'),
> +            emptyText: Proxmox.Utils.defaultText,
> +            minValue: 0,
> +            maxValue: 9000,
> +            allowBlank: true,
> +            cbind: {
> +                deleteEmpty: '{!isCreate}',
> +            },
> +        },
> +        {
> +            xtype: 'proxmoxintegerfield',
> +            name: 'ipv6-ra-interval',
> +            fieldLabel: gettext('RA Interval (s)'),
> +            emptyText: '600',
> +            minValue: 4,
> +            maxValue: 1800,
> +            allowBlank: true,
> +            cbind: {
> +                deleteEmpty: '{!isCreate}',
> +            },
> +        },
> +        {
> +            xtype: 'proxmoxintegerfield',
> +            name: 'ipv6-ra-mtu',
> +            fieldLabel: gettext('Advertised MTU'),
> +            minValue: 1280,
> +            maxValue: 65535,
> +            allowBlank: true,
> +            cbind: {
> +                deleteEmpty: '{!isCreate}',
> +            },
> +        },
> +    ],
> +});

the advanced options of the IPv6 RA tab are never shown, even with
"Advanced" ticked.

As far as I can tell from a quick glance into proxmox-widget-toolkit,
this would need to be fixed there, because the Advanced checkbox only
toggles the advanced options of the General tab. Alternatively, all of
the options could be made non-advanced as this tab by it self is already
advanced.