From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [45.144.208.40]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4F871FF0B7 for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2026 11:39:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4EC5021501; Fri, 30 Oct 2026 11:39:36 +0100 (CET) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2026 11:39:32 +0100 Message-Id: Subject: Re: [PATCH qemu-server v2 2/7] drive: get tpm state size: also warn if there was no size returned From: "Elias Huhsovitz" To: "Fiona Ebner" , X-Mailer: aerc 0.20.0 References: <20261029120811.107814-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> <20261029120811.107814-3-f.ebner@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <20261029120811.107814-3-f.ebner@proxmox.com> X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1793356772419 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.474 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment (newer systems) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: PUJZIF3KFTFXQ6WNHLGV3R54DHTKIUAS X-Message-ID-Hash: PUJZIF3KFTFXQ6WNHLGV3R54DHTKIUAS X-MailFrom: e.huhsovitz@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: More specific error messages make debugging easier, so consider this: Reviewed-by: Elias Huhsovitz On Thu Oct 29, 2026 at 1:06 PM CET, Fiona Ebner wrote: > Some storage plugin implementations of the volume_size_info() method > do not fail with a hard error. In particular, the native file-based > plugins use file_size_info() which returns undef upon failure. Thus, > explicitly check the size. > > Signed-off-by: Fiona Ebner > --- > > New in v2. > > src/PVE/QemuServer/Drive.pm | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/src/PVE/QemuServer/Drive.pm b/src/PVE/QemuServer/Drive.pm > index 0ca3d636..7b288e78 100644 > --- a/src/PVE/QemuServer/Drive.pm > +++ b/src/PVE/QemuServer/Drive.pm > @@ -1334,7 +1334,9 @@ sub get_tpmstate_size { > if !defined($storecfg); > =20 > my $size =3D eval { PVE::Storage::volume_size_info($storecfg, $volid= , 10) }; > - warn "failed to get size of the tpm drive $volid: $@" if $@; > + my $err =3D $@; > + $err =3D "no size in result" if !$err && !$size; > + warn "failed to get size of the tpm drive $volid: $err" if $err; > =20 > if (!$size || $size < TPMSTATE_DISK_SIZE) { > $size =3D TPMSTATE_DISK_SIZE;