From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [45.144.208.40]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEDBA1FF09B for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2026 17:49:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 977CE214E0; Mon, 12 Oct 2026 17:49:20 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 17:49:14 +0200 Message-Id: To: =?utf-8?q?Michael_K=C3=B6ppl?= , Subject: superseded: [PATCH many v7 00/24] add option to prevent suggesting previously used VMIDs From: =?utf-8?q?Michael_K=C3=B6ppl?= X-Mailer: aerc 0.22.0 References: <20261005144805.825538-1-m.koeppl@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <20261005144805.825538-1-m.koeppl@proxmox.com> X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1791820154272 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.255 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment (newer systems) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: KJ7UOEIJ3GWJJIOBQTYQEYYQFFHKBEXL X-Message-ID-Hash: KJ7UOEIJ3GWJJIOBQTYQEYYQFFHKBEXL X-MailFrom: m.koeppl@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Superseded by: https://lore.proxmox.com/pve-devel/20261012154600.877830-1-m.koeppl@proxmox= .com On Mon Oct 5, 2026 at 4:47 PM CEST, Michael K=C3=B6ppl wrote: > This is based on the original series [0] by Severen Redwood and Daniel > Krambrock. It is rebased on the latest master branches and incorporates > the feedback from v6 [2]. > > The last patch for cluster, qemu-server and container and the last two > for guest-common and manager add the optional enforcement of the > next-id settings. The rest of the series works without them. Since IDs > are recorded before a guest exists and stay recorded if its creation > fails, retrying a failed creation with the same ID is rejected when [snip]