From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [45.144.208.40]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51E1B1FF09C for ; Mon, 05 Oct 2026 12:27:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B42442144F; Mon, 05 Oct 2026 12:27:15 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2026 12:27:10 +0200 Message-Id: From: =?utf-8?q?Michael_K=C3=B6ppl?= To: "Fiona Ebner" , =?utf-8?q?Michael_K=C3=B6ppl?= , Subject: Re: [PATCH many v6 00/18] add option to prevent suggesting previously used VMIDs X-Mailer: aerc 0.22.0 References: <20260924161510.847362-1-m.koeppl@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1791196030915 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.760 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment (newer systems) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: PTINCSRVH7X4ZI4L7MODLX5ZIEQ4SZOX X-Message-ID-Hash: PTINCSRVH7X4ZI4L7MODLX5ZIEQ4SZOX X-MailFrom: m.koeppl@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Thu Oct 1, 2026 at 2:07 PM CEST, Fiona Ebner wrote: > Am 24.09.26 um 6:16 PM schrieb Michael K=C3=B6ppl: >> This is based on the original series [0] by Severen Redwood and Daniel >> Krambrock. It is rebased on the latest master branches and incorporates >> the feedback from v5 [1]. > > This is coming along nicely. There is some polishing and naming > improvements left to be done, but it looks very good to me in general! > > The UI always shows "This VM ID is already in use" when the next-id > endpoint fails and doesn't properly propagate the actual error from the > backend. Thanks for having another look at this version and for pointing this out. Will fix it in v7 which I'll send later today, also adding a pve-docs patch and incorporating the remaining improvements! > > For completeness, you could add a pve-docs patch to describe the new > file in pmxcfs.adoc