From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [45.144.208.40]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4FFD1FF0B4 for ; Tue, 08 Sep 2026 13:47:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CEF7521493; Tue, 08 Sep 2026 13:47:36 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2026 13:47:32 +0200 Message-Id: Subject: Re: [PATCH docs 1/2] cephx-migration: Replace consumer with client From: =?utf-8?q?Michael_K=C3=B6ppl?= To: "Maximiliano Sandoval" , Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: aerc 0.22.0 References: <20260908113718.326913-1-m.sandoval@proxmox.com> <20260908113718.326913-2-m.sandoval@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <20260908113718.326913-2-m.sandoval@proxmox.com> X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1788868045154 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.775 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment (newer systems) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: KKFU7D2F4RMVSM4HIQ6WLP5BZBVOUEAB X-Message-ID-Hash: KKFU7D2F4RMVSM4HIQ6WLP5BZBVOUEAB X-MailFrom: m.koeppl@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: 1 nit inline. Apart from that, consider this: Reviewed-by: Michael K=C3=B6ppl On Tue Sep 8, 2026 at 1:37 PM CEST, Maximiliano Sandoval wrote: > The later term is used more often in the Proxmox VE documentation and ups= tream > [1]. The Consumer row is removed from the table to avoid being redudant a= fter nit: s/redudant/redundant > replacing it with Client. > > [1] https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/dev/cephx/ > > Signed-off-by: Maximiliano Sandoval > --- [snip]