From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [45.144.208.40]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49CD51FF0B2 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2026 15:03:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1FC51215EB; Mon, 24 Aug 2026 15:03:55 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2026 15:03:51 +0200 Message-Id: Subject: superseded: [PATCH manager] fix #7896: ui: qemu: show effective machine version for Windows guests From: "Jakob Klocker" To: "Jakob Klocker" , X-Mailer: aerc 0.20.0 References: <20260819092833.114930-1-j.klocker@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <20260819092833.114930-1-j.klocker@proxmox.com> X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1787576601857 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 1.759 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment (newer systems) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: IVT2GVCSCJHX26NWGTCKRTQTLQLYZ67O X-Message-ID-Hash: IVT2GVCSCJHX26NWGTCKRTQTLQLYZ67O X-MailFrom: j.klocker@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Superseded-by: https://lore.proxmox.com/all/20260824130155.249596-1-j.klock= er@proxmox.com/T/#u On Wed Aug 19, 2026 at 11:28 AM CEST, Jakob Klocker wrote: > Windows guests without an explicitly pinned machine version still run > with a fixed one: guests created with QEMU 9.1 or newer keep the > version they were created with, older ones fall back to 5.1. > [snip]