From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a0f:8001:1:32::40])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88B2B1FF138
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2026 10:51:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 57DDB214D0;
	Wed, 22 Jul 2026 10:51:53 +0200 (CEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2026 10:51:19 +0200
Message-Id: <DK4YZRM1YNWK.125I9J8ME8UDS@proxmox.com>
To: "Daniel Kral" <d.kral@proxmox.com>, <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-SERIES docs/ha-manager/manager v2 00/12] Negative Node
 Affinity Rules
From: "Daniel Kral" <d.kral@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: aerc 0.21.0-147-g43ac7b685014-dirty
References: <20260602100226.180071-1-d.kral@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20260602100226.180071-1-d.kral@proxmox.com>
X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2
X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1784710251972
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
	AWL                    -0.102 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From:
 address
	DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
	KAM_DMARC_STATUS         0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict
 Alignment (newer systems)
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW        -0.7 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 low trust
	SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
	SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Message-ID-Hash: ATRQM7N4GTUSZGH24QDRTLPRJD5MDN6F
X-Message-ID-Hash: ATRQM7N4GTUSZGH24QDRTLPRJD5MDN6F
X-MailFrom: d.kral@proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop;
 banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation;
 administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation;
 no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:pve-devel-owner@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-join@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-leave@lists.proxmox.com>

Superseded-by: https://lore.proxmox.com/pve-devel/20260722084824.108350-1-d=
.kral@proxmox.com/

On Tue Jun 2, 2026 at 12:01 PM CEST, Daniel Kral wrote:
> For larger HA clusters, specifying the nodes in simple* node affinity
> rules as opt-out (negative) instead of opt-in (positive) can make the
> rule set easier to follow and implement by users.
>
> * simple =3D without priority groups