From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a0f:8001:1:32::40]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F1BC1FF138 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2026 16:07:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id F2D4821427; Mon, 29 Jun 2026 16:07:15 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2026 16:06:41 +0200 Message-Id: Subject: superseded: [pve-devel] [PATCH container/qemu-server/storage v8 00/10] fix #3711 and adapt drive detach/remove behavior Cc: "pve-devel" From: =?utf-8?q?Michael_K=C3=B6ppl?= To: "Proxmox VE development discussion" X-Mailer: aerc 0.21.0 References: <20250626160626.311407-1-m.koeppl@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <20250626160626.311407-1-m.koeppl@proxmox.com> X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1782741991252 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.087 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: APESVKTHW5LQFQUXWLX57HWRYNOM6XWC X-Message-ID-Hash: APESVKTHW5LQFQUXWLX57HWRYNOM6XWC X-MailFrom: m.koeppl@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Superseded-by: https://lore.proxmox.com/pve-devel/20260629140439.184878-1-m.koeppl@proxmox= .com/ On Thu Jun 26, 2025 at 6:06 PM CEST, Michael K=C3=B6ppl wrote: > This series aims to fix #3711 [0] and streamline the detach/remove > behavior around volumes that are either mounted into a container or [snip]