From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3AF601FF141
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Tue, 02 Jun 2026 12:05:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 13CD8EFEB;
	Tue,  2 Jun 2026 12:05:15 +0200 (CEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2026 12:04:40 +0200
Message-Id: <DIYH8ORL7KMT.2PD7CGML8NWMR@proxmox.com>
From: "Daniel Kral" <d.kral@proxmox.com>
To: "Proxmox VE development discussion" <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Subject: superseded: [pve-devel] [RFC PATCH-SERIES ha-manager 0/2] Negative
 Node Affinity Rules
X-Mailer: aerc 0.21.0-145-gf21bb67f8cab-dirty
References: <20251219133643.295514-1-d.kral@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20251219133643.295514-1-d.kral@proxmox.com>
X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2
X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1780394645198
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
	AWL                     0.074 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From:
 address
	BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
	DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
	KAM_DMARC_STATUS         0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict
 Alignment
	SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
	SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Message-ID-Hash: MHBRJTWSFORW5Z6HA33CLCIG4UUHOJRL
X-Message-ID-Hash: MHBRJTWSFORW5Z6HA33CLCIG4UUHOJRL
X-MailFrom: d.kral@proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop;
 banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation;
 administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation;
 no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:pve-devel-owner@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-join@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-leave@lists.proxmox.com>

On Fri Dec 19, 2025 at 2:35 PM CET, Daniel Kral wrote:
> For larger HA clusters, specifying the nodes in simple* node affinity
> rules as opt-out (negative) instead of opt-in (positive) can make the
> rule set easier to follow and implement by users.
>
> * simple =3D without priority groups

Superseded-by: https://lore.proxmox.com/pve-devel/20260602100226.180071-1-d=
.kral@proxmox.com/