From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8B921FF133 for ; Mon, 11 May 2026 12:01:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id BC47D1254B; Mon, 11 May 2026 12:01:12 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 12:00:38 +0200 Message-Id: Subject: Re: [PATCH installer 4/8] sys: net: drop the now-unused `ipconf` runtime environment configuration From: "Christoph Heiss" To: "Hannes Laimer" X-Mailer: aerc 0.21.0 References: <20260508184546.113293-1-c.heiss@proxmox.com> <20260508184546.113293-5-c.heiss@proxmox.com> <9afb6cab-e0eb-4b61-80b1-b38702f861b5@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <9afb6cab-e0eb-4b61-80b1-b38702f861b5@proxmox.com> X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1778493527048 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.076 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: FQY3BGJMPBVPEESU4S6JBO5TWRSBLODK X-Message-ID-Hash: FQY3BGJMPBVPEESU4S6JBO5TWRSBLODK X-MailFrom: c.heiss@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header CC: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Thanks for the review! On Mon May 11, 2026 at 10:55 AM CEST, Hannes Laimer wrote: > `$run_env->{ipconfig}` is still accessed in `extract_data` (Install.pm) > we should probably just use `$run_env->{network}->{interfaces}` like we > do for pinning Again good catch, thanks! If nothing else comes up, I'll send a v2 later.