From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EF6F1FF140 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2026 10:32:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id DBFB9F353; Fri, 24 Apr 2026 10:32:36 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2026 10:31:32 +0200 Message-Id: Subject: superseded: [PATCH common/proxmox{,-backup}/storage 0/7] establish unique instance-id for PBS nodes From: "Lukas Wagner" To: "Lukas Wagner" , , X-Mailer: aerc 0.21.0-0-g5549850facc2-dirty References: <20260415115817.348947-1-l.wagner@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <20260415115817.348947-1-l.wagner@proxmox.com> X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1777019402899 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.096 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment POISEN_SPAM_PILL 0.1 Meta: its spam POISEN_SPAM_PILL_1 0.1 random spam to be learned in bayes POISEN_SPAM_PILL_3 0.1 random spam to be learned in bayes SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: WCFHLXB2LH2IAMN7UZOWF3H5XINGEA7L X-Message-ID-Hash: WCFHLXB2LH2IAMN7UZOWF3H5XINGEA7L X-MailFrom: l.wagner@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Wed Apr 15, 2026 at 1:58 PM CEST, Lukas Wagner wrote: > In PDM we require some way to match PBS storage <-> PBS remote. > > Having some kind of unique ID for each PBS instance should make it quite = easy > to establish such a mapping completely automatically. > > The general approach is > 1.) add /nodes/localhost/server-identity route in PBS, returning a uniq= ue, per-installation ID > 2.) add something like /nodes/.../storage//identity in PVE, which u= ses > proxmox-backup-client internally to return the instance ID for this P= BS storage > 3.) PDM can then use both API routes to establish the mapping > superseded-by: https://lore.proxmox.com/pve-devel/20260424082943.89614-1-l.= wagner@proxmox.com/T/#t