From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB73A1FF13C for ; Thu, 19 Mar 2026 17:57:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id F0B157201; Thu, 19 Mar 2026 17:57:29 +0100 (CET) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2026 17:56:54 +0100 Message-Id: From: "Daniel Kral" To: "Daniel Kral" , Subject: Re: [PATCH-SERIES ha-manager v2 00/10] include non-HA resources in usage accounting X-Mailer: aerc 0.21.0-38-g7088c3642f2c-dirty References: <20260319164047.642936-1-d.kral@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <20260319164047.642936-1-d.kral@proxmox.com> X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1773939371477 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -1.013 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.408 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.819 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.903 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: T7B4ZQ2D32NP7V544MAVSNHLUEEYVC6Y X-Message-ID-Hash: T7B4ZQ2D32NP7V544MAVSNHLUEEYVC6Y X-MailFrom: d.kral@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Thu Mar 19, 2026 at 5:33 PM CET, Daniel Kral wrote: > This series is split out from [0] to make the static/dynamic load > balancer series a little more straight forward to reason through. > > This series adds any running non-HA resource into the existing basic and > static usage scheduler accounting to base decisions on the usage of the > whole cluster instead of just the HA resources. > > For clusters where every guest is configured as a HA resource nothing > should change. > > I tested a few simple cases in a 3 node cluster for both the basic and > static usage which are variations of: > > - 1 running HA resource on each node, starting them on any node (with > homogeneous nodes and guests) will rebalance them on the > alphabetically first node as before > - 1 running HA resource on node1, running 3 non-HA resources on node2, > starting another HA resource on node1 will rebalance it to node3 > - 3 non-HA resources on node1, starting a HA resource on node1 will > rebalance it to node2 > - non-running HA and non-HA resources are excluded from the usage > accounting > - starting non-HA resources doesn't have any effect obviously > Sorry for the noise, there are only two changes in the series in patch #9: - removing the duplicate $sid as suggested by @Thomas, and - adding constants for indexing the rrd status indirectly suggested by @Thomas in a later patch in the series. Otherwise the series is identical to the patches from [0]. > [0] https://lore.proxmox.com/pve-devel/20260217141437.584852-1-d.kral@pro= xmox.com/