From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60AE41FF17A
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Tue, 25 Nov 2025 12:19:55 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3A2F514596;
	Tue, 25 Nov 2025 12:20:05 +0100 (CET)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2025 12:19:31 +0100
Message-Id: <DEHQH18T846Y.2L60SNGAXST1T@proxmox.com>
To: "ribbon" <ribbon@skrbn.sakura.ne.jp>
X-Mailer: aerc 0.20.0
References: <20251117164756.432508-1-s.sterz@proxmox.com>
 <176339946305.3864094.11466727722226385250.b4-ty@proxmox.com>
 <mailman.1281.1763420004.362.pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
 <aSWPYfPNXAp-ru-g@ns.ribbon.or.jp>
In-Reply-To: <aSWPYfPNXAp-ru-g@ns.ribbon.or.jp>
From: "Shannon Sterz" <s.sterz@proxmox.com>
X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2
X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1764069535824
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.086 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 WEIRD_PORT              0.001 Uses non-standard port number for HTTP
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] Typo?
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Cc: Proxmox VE development
 discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>

On Tue Nov 25, 2025 at 12:13 PM CET, ribbon wrote:
> I found the following content in ja.po. Could this be a typo?
>
> #: proxmox-yew-comp/src/form/pve/lxc_property/mod.rs:179
> #, fuzzy
> msgid "Hostame"
>
>
> ribbon

yes, this is a typo. thanks for noticing. i send a patch and it was
already applied :)

[1]: https://lore.proxmox.com/yew-devel/20251125095431.51182-1-s.sterz@proxmox.com/T/#t


_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel