From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1E841FF16F
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Tue, 27 May 2025 14:28:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7A68913850;
	Tue, 27 May 2025 14:28:48 +0200 (CEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 14:28:44 +0200
Message-Id: <DA6XYVO2XMIN.33E2PWVL39SIL@noor>
From: "Shan Shaji" <s.shaji@proxmox.com>
To: "Shan Shaji" <s.shaji@proxmox.com>, <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: aerc 0.14.0
References: <20250505143331.83707-1-s.shaji@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20250505143331.83707-1-s.shaji@proxmox.com>
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.397 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [material.io]
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH pve_flutter_frontend] ui: replace deprecated
 `onBackground` property
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>

Ping

On Mon May 5, 2025 at 4:33 PM CEST, Shan Shaji wrote:
> As of flutter v3.22, the `onBackground` property is deprecated. The
> material guidelines suggest using the `onSurface` property instead.
>
> https://m3.material.io/styles/color/roles#8562cf18-5cc0-44ae-b783-2e38bdb39585
>
> For dark theme, the `onSurface` color and `onBackground` color is
> different so it's not possible to directly replace the `onBackground`
> with the `onSurface` property. This patch adds a new `onSurfaceVariant`
> property to the theme and replaces all instances of `onBackground`
> with `onSurfaceVariant`.



_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel