From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41A221FF17C
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Wed,  2 Apr 2025 10:50:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id EAB5AC958;
	Wed,  2 Apr 2025 10:50:14 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2025 10:49:41 +0200
Message-Id: <D8W0V7A166IQ.12UUD63VWDJAA@proxmox.com>
From: "Christoph Heiss" <c.heiss@proxmox.com>
To: "Gabriel Goller" <g.goller@proxmox.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: aerc 0.20.1
References: <20250328171340.885413-1-g.goller@proxmox.com>
 <20250328171340.885413-53-g.goller@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20250328171340.885413-53-g.goller@proxmox.com>
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.031 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-docs 1/1] fabrics: add initial
 documentation for sdn fabrics
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Cc: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>

On Fri Mar 28, 2025 at 6:13 PM CET, Gabriel Goller wrote:
[..]
> +
> +Installation
> +~~~~~~~~~~~~
> +
> +We use the FRR implementations of OpenFabric and OSPF, so first you need to
> +install `frr` and the `frr-pythontools` package:

Rather try to avoid first-person, as per our style guide [0].

Could be rephrased as e.g.

  The FRR implementations of OpenFabric and OSPF are used, so first the
  `frr` and `frr-pythontools` packages must be installed:

[0] https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Technical_Writing_Style_Guide#Avoid_first_person

> +
> +----
> +apt update
> +apt install frr frr-pythontools
> +----
> +
[..]
> +
> +[[pvesdn_openfabric_node]]
> +On the Node
> +^^^^^^^^^^^
> +
> +Node:: Select the node which will be added to the fabric. Only nodes that
> +currently are in the cluster will be shown.
> +
> +Router-ID:: A unique IPv4 or IPv6 address used to generate the OpenFabric
> +Network Entity Title (NET). Each node in the same fabric must have a different
> +Router-ID, while a single node must use the same NET address across all fabrics
> +(this consistency is automatically managed by {pve}).
> +
> +NOTE: When using IPv6 addresses, we use the last 3 segments to generate the
> +NET. Ensure these segments differ between nodes.

Same here w.r.t. first person ("we use").

> +
> +Interfaces:: Specify the interfaces used to establish peering connections with
> +other OpenFabric nodes. Preferably select interfaces without pre-assigned IP
> +addresses, then configure addresses in the IPv4/IPv6 column if needed. A dummy
> +"loopback" interface with the router-id is automatically created.
> +Interface-specific settings override the global fabric settings.
> +
> +The following optional parameters can be configured per interface when enabling
> +the additional columns:

Perhaps this sentence should be made a bit more prominent, e.g. as
sub-heading? It's easy to read over it and miss it, but it's quite
important piece of information. Especially if your not *that* familiar
with the UI and enablable columns.

There are advanced options, so hiding them by default is good IMO - just
a bit confusing to have big headings with the option names but nowhere
to enable them (directly).

[..]
> +
> +[[pvesdn_ospf_node]]
> +On the Node
> +^^^^^^^^^^^
> +
> +Node:: Select the node which will be added to the fabric. Only nodes that
> +currently are in the cluster will be shown.
> +
> +Router-ID:: A unique IPv4 address used to identify this router within the OSPF
> +network. Each node in the same fabric must have a different Router-ID.
> +
> +Interfaces:: Specify the interfaces used to establish peering connections with
> +other OSPF nodes. Preferably select interfaces without pre-assigned IP
> +addresses, then configure addresses in the IPv4 column if needed. A dummy
> +"loopback" interface with the router-id is automatically created.
> +
> +The following optional parameter can be configured per interface when enabling
> +the additional columns:

^ Same as above.


_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel