From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F0411FF17C
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Wed,  2 Apr 2025 10:39:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B8B17C74E;
	Wed,  2 Apr 2025 10:39:37 +0200 (CEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2025 10:39:03 +0200
Message-Id: <D8W0N2I2SFYQ.N3X4NZYBWP0J@proxmox.com>
From: "Christoph Heiss" <c.heiss@proxmox.com>
To: "Stefan Hanreich" <s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: aerc 0.20.1
References: <20250401133616.331046-1-s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
 <20250401133616.331046-3-s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20250401133616.331046-3-s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.031 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [address.rs]
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH proxmox-ve-rs v2 1/1] ve-config: move types
 to proxmox-network-types
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Cc: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>

Just a quick note:

On Tue Apr 1, 2025 at 3:36 PM CEST, Stefan Hanreich wrote:
[..]
> diff --git a/proxmox-ve-config/src/firewall/types/address.rs b/proxmox-ve-config/src/firewall/types/address.rs
> index 9b73d3d..548b813 100644
> --- a/proxmox-ve-config/src/firewall/types/address.rs
> +++ b/proxmox-ve-config/src/firewall/types/address.rs
[..]
> -        assert_eq!(
> -            [Ipv6Cidr::new(
> -                [0xFFFF, 0xFFFF, 0xFFFF, 0xFFFF, 0xFFFF, 0xFFFF, 0xFFFF, 0xFFFF],
> -                128
> -            )
> -            .unwrap(),],
> -            range.to_cidrs().as_slice()
> -        );
> -    }
>  }
> +

nit: new blank line at eof, guess just an accidental typo? :^)

Came across it while applying the patch for a quick compile-test.

  Applying: ve-config: move types to proxmox-network-types
  .git/rebase-apply/patch:1548: new blank line at EOF.
  +
  warning: 1 line adds whitespace errors.

Just wanted to mention, can easily be fixed up during applying as well.
Definitely not worth a resend in any case, IMO.



_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel