From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAB501FF165 for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Wed, 26 Feb 2025 15:57:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 541C0175CE; Wed, 26 Feb 2025 15:57:50 +0100 (CET) Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 15:57:15 +0100 Message-Id: <D82GRKOK3GYH.DAP4XCUDV9RT@proxmox.com> From: "Alexander Zeidler" <a.zeidler@proxmox.com> To: "Proxmox VE development discussion" <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> References: <20250226123800.296746-1-m.sandoval@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <20250226123800.296746-1-m.sandoval@proxmox.com> X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.089 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH installer] html: pmg: Improve wording X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com> On Wed Feb 26, 2025 at 1:38 PM CET, Maximiliano Sandoval wrote: > Signed-off-by: Maximiliano Sandoval <m.sandoval@proxmox.com> > --- > html/pmg/extract3-spam.htm | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/html/pmg/extract3-spam.htm b/html/pmg/extract3-spam.htm > index 6b3551a..62bf009 100644 > --- a/html/pmg/extract3-spam.htm > +++ b/html/pmg/extract3-spam.htm > @@ -18,10 +18,10 @@ > <tr><td><b>The Spam filter</b> > uses a variety of local and network tests to identify spam signatures. > <br><br> > - This makes it very hard for spammers to identify one aspect which they can craft their messages > - to work around and almost eliminates false positives. > + This makes it very hard for spammers to identify one aspect which they can use to craft their messages > + to work around spam detection, and it almost eliminates false positives. > <br><br> > - Although using many different technologies the spam filter requires very little configuration. > + Although it uses many different technologies the spam filter requires very little configuration. s/technologies/technologies,/ > </td></tr> > </table> > </td> _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel