From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71CBD1FF165
for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Wed, 29 Jan 2025 10:34:36 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id F0C251D33C;
Wed, 29 Jan 2025 10:34:32 +0100 (CET)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 10:34:29 +0100
Message-Id: <D7EGD6JHPNGU.333J1CVQM1KXY@proxmox.com>
From: "Christoph Heiss" <c.heiss@proxmox.com>
To: "Proxmox VE development discussion" <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: aerc 0.18.2
References: <20241205140721.207021-1-d.kral@proxmox.com>
<f7b6603b-4423-464e-8fc2-0df5ed956650@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <f7b6603b-4423-464e-8fc2-0df5ed956650@proxmox.com>
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0
AWL 0.028 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy
KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
Validity was blocked. See
https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
information.
RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
Validity was blocked. See
https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
information.
RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
Validity was blocked. See
https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
information.
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [RFC PATCH installer] fix #5973: auto: first boot:
allow snake- and kebabcased property names
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
On Tue Jan 28, 2025 at 3:38 PM CET, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
> Am 05.12.24 um 15:07 schrieb Daniel Kral:
[..]
> > - with `cert-fingerprint` (which works correctly as expected), and
> > - with `cert_fingerprint` (which will fail at a parser error with the
> > newest Proxmox VE 8.3-1 ISO).
>
> This is a bit worded like that behavior would be a regression, but it
> isn't AFAICT as this was always kebab-case from when being added in
> commit 6526662 ("fix #5579: auto-installer: add optional first-boot hook
> script"); or am I overlooking something?
To provide context; since I actually introduced this option/code: That
was indeed intentionally kebab-cased, as we prefer that style for new
code - as explained below.
[..]
> > -#[serde(rename_all = "kebab-case", deny_unknown_fields)]
> > +#[serde(deny_unknown_fields)]
>
> But we prefer kebab-case for any public API/CLI parameter for modern code;
> so shouldn't we rather to the opposite, transform all other (de)serializable
> configs to use kebab-case with backward-compat aliases for the cases it
> matters?
I'd prefer that variant too, FWIW.
_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel