From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBC181FF16F for ; Fri, 29 Nov 2024 11:55:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0643316CB0; Fri, 29 Nov 2024 11:55:38 +0100 (CET) Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 11:55:35 +0100 Message-Id: From: "Shannon Sterz" To: "Thomas Lamprecht" , "Proxmox VE development discussion" , "Lukas Wagner" X-Mailer: aerc 0.18.2-0-ge037c095a049-dirty References: <20240624123134.321417-1-l.wagner@proxmox.com> <0c825d39-69cc-49ce-a078-647818f6cc5a@proxmox.com> <6a0f2b99-eab2-49f1-ac04-b01cbb041b03@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <6a0f2b99-eab2-49f1-ac04-b01cbb041b03@proxmox.com> X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.038 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH proxmox 1/6] notify: copy sendmail/forward fn's from proxmox_sys X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" On Tue Nov 26, 2024 at 11:21 AM CET, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: > Am 26.11.24 um 10:27 schrieb Shannon Sterz: > > actually i needed to adapt this to add support for attachments, which > > require reworking the multipart logic a bit too. i can factor that out > > into it's own `proxmox-sendmail` crate or similar and make > > `proxmox-notify`'s sendmail endpoint use that too. if that's desired, i > > can send patches for that too. > > Yeah, that might be nice. While this probably won't have a very high reusability, > it can be carved out nicely in a standalone crate, and it should also not be a > (fast) moving target, so fine to have as separate crate IMO. finally managed to send patches for this, see here [1]. [1]: https://lore.proxmox.com/pbs-devel/20241129105321.143877-1-s.sterz@proxmox.com/ _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel