From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 267A960707 for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 09:06:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 156CEC33F for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 09:06:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-qk1-x744.google.com (mail-qk1-x744.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::744]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id A2292C32A for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 09:06:11 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-qk1-x744.google.com with SMTP id x25so903590qkj.3 for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 00:06:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=G2oicxj/ncZeAf7PqhERk3ELSuWdyfZMP6pM7JlMVnU=; b=eS6xb6qC9FVrALG+c9w3Z06XgGWaj3WuG3BqPx3HK9m3qzyZkymaUh9uHHEmbitiO4 gCyQFjh2t4ChUAKAHiJrNQpwnd7nCMMhObt8hl9bTc+QsCo00wG+bthPHmLa+Uarjkcp ln0db6m+66EW7n6igPZdqHvHRt+HRggXWV0gsxnYzHKshQXXVIzl119ylKzlbyXIXtgz TiDpelQx06KzzLs+AdAsWhCit9eg/ym85/idv5phqcB3dqmy/eycvOlyfSTZYW9r1pgW y0XMjtYrx445dzfaoLmPMY5jmIAjCHguchBGjCvr/41iWwI9atGgY+11aEXHoSaujoHZ jS3w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=G2oicxj/ncZeAf7PqhERk3ELSuWdyfZMP6pM7JlMVnU=; b=bIV0rScZ9BTj7Qc5dnLZxPmOMtwvNiQWYibRs9pcVcs5hWL9QM+YUfGmMDEomsrcgL 9/0YyuTot0yUxkGKd0aj/6XYIdrJFwKEw9hAruDD1tWFB8NfN0YPJ5wZ/LSi9HGaODbl HGMZnzQnmgMlLqaP+vJNWHq7LemFcC788/x2owr4HW5SdvdiCKkHzJn6/lUQTM7fdaHX v59SPcttMLEzLCSyWN0kR8AB/q+udBTc7fwmsKAsA8O13N0b0AEb2k/uJBclzWX8/Kf9 +1yTciznQayIzJjUfkRlqYmuh6F8ynimeqHAiEikFfUox9NHJurMJ7OVUvkUZ8cNJSAs f9EA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533WoDPFeKeHCOcldqFbkPtqiuGjleBHrzi2yB8aV9y+If57ZNUM xwH/Tk3/gZnL2RPVhgKvFr+UvVL+dYWNeXnaNvkRN1KhpETAbAUp X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyU5EpnVz3lV3kVLMhFdjZFGqoRtudS+mSz/6XFdUZ1nzJ0alnvMpC6FnrEkx6f7Z2VpndBivxz2nztWqV0uxA= X-Received: by 2002:a37:a44e:: with SMTP id n75mr1925192qke.406.1606377965314; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 00:06:05 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <817953729.92.1592826225983@webmail.proxmox.com> <1101863268.50.1592902077180@webmail.proxmox.com> <478743729.685.1606367166698@webmail.proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <478743729.685.1606367166698@webmail.proxmox.com> From: Bruce Wainer Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 03:05:54 -0500 Message-ID: To: Dietmar Maurer Cc: Proxmox VE development discussion , Wolfgang Link , PVE development discussion X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-zsync 0/1] Allow pve-zsync jobs to share dest X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 08:06:42 -0000 Awesome, thank you very much! On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 12:06 AM Dietmar Maurer wrote: > > It has been 5 months since my patch has been applied, however the version > > for pve-zsync has not been incremented and this patch is not in the > version > > presented by the repo. What needs to be done? > > Ok, just bumped the version and created a new package. So this will be part > of the next release (soon) ... > >