From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7D3B6B523 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 22:41:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CAFE019EF8 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 22:41:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-ej1-x62e.google.com (mail-ej1-x62e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 31E1C19EE1 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 22:41:27 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-ej1-x62e.google.com with SMTP id lt17so9500852ejb.3 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 13:41:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=8BFIsvaDyNo3NpL57doOGox0Q5sLy7Goa/J4SHPOlXQ=; b=GYa0TeJvi/J/6du+nDLr7DdTDJmiPSiM1/YlzscoILAdS3FIqW0D037EXtyIcajfRY 0jrcJ7xoGh4qgwVvumLiYziLBj+SEp6XEQQ0OIQSbPKQmXxyeh/qpufLLgXyESmBuy65 mu2yQQ3b5iyoLd27cKtqEJFpyg+zPMEyyhM/aj1n2zlfdMVbjNNAu1CDRs4h4ZjtlSDT iCVcXjuavlogo+5XU26hg29C31g2VFdixg4E/VwDKH/QNzU4RTmIRpGr0OoDIF8ozwb5 XXM07adlQNpjCANqo1H8WukgQScDfJ0oocmVEEuEU/0kHyewzo8zT6Ktg3geK06nbcf+ NIew== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=8BFIsvaDyNo3NpL57doOGox0Q5sLy7Goa/J4SHPOlXQ=; b=et3etsQjOQGEPsVNgIUdoDX/5rGylqZSRWT7nYDYCOdze57o4KmQekUKD3CBB8hqEE LmejzRJhzWKglBVgf9PeaCOnLfx9dJ8YKQPQXOi20TOCOjjLLbX8MFtakD/RjSMOl8aZ 07pvBlF0epnxZtaFJKRiISTXfWgHfu52vb+2GfxU27W96bMMr/us8jmux/dAl1228qxm csNphZiq/6SrVxX9ZF+39iWjMOetpHOhZ6rB92/HBOBdgMPT13uWRXjmePyI9e3DmXmK 47sM/G3cbwkqhRBJYmPFp2AUs/biTt7acUpntRwbY2F11ngGAvG9eF13EhZ8RabN5/RA IJAw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530EhFfgvt9Lkhl8BNM1hqAbAV3msvD+fiIEDDrziyFg5CGsyaXp bg9FybQmJTWnkbYr/jBqR792Peq9/5vXwkNL1WjtemI26dRZOVJ+ X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJztThzmorAFPkHCtpSUGseOEjQh5qtjSSa/hzLmC7Scth6OxvuXEiPyeHqpvn7By8d7dJoRHFZyjRAhMnv1xIo= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1b46:: with SMTP id p6mr8384398ejg.68.1607636480426; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 13:41:20 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Bruce Wainer Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 16:41:09 -0500 Message-ID: To: Proxmox VE development discussion X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.215 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [pve-manager] sdn: Adding phpIPAM as IPAM provider X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 21:41:28 -0000 Great thanks, I thought I had seen it in one of the patches but when I looked back at some of the more recent submissions it looked like only the internal IPAM was being implemented at first. Bruce On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 3:33 AM alexandre derumier wrote: > Hi, > phpIPAM is already implemented :) > > (currently phpIPAM && netbox) > > On 09/12/2020 20:01, Bruce Wainer wrote: > > Hello, > > In your new SDN environment, are there plans for a plugin for phpIPAM? If > > not, can you provide any starting points for developing one? > > Thank you, > > Bruce Wainer > > _______________________________________________ > > pve-devel mailing list > > pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com > > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel > > > > > _______________________________________________ > pve-devel mailing list > pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel > >