From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66D606B4F2 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 20:30:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 54F4D17F87 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 20:30:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-qk1-x735.google.com (mail-qk1-x735.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::735]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 4E06117FEA for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 20:30:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-qk1-x735.google.com with SMTP id o13so258973qkk.9 for ; Tue, 03 Aug 2021 11:30:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=8J4LWeIf4HI5SxsyAfrOW1Gdhy5FphUlk/m+Mhc7T2w=; b=ZuvlGQh6IVRFIYye/0J9eJEAvBlcxQ5vYm7FZQUU/xAOFBY0iUHud7VJu3dkhQLey6 GwbqpeVXVqO7cWFDX61ScQv4Y/+c2uYy9eM5UDipwF+0U0vYwEkeu4rT7w+SYSmk7p16 yfwgKX60JhMdZiBFMBF2ZtZ4h5xawbuLJnh8sp2nIK8OqpHEH2/CPIhmMhSwM4PbJcb6 QTkeS2VWBtRocKgjko2NE0rD9qz4J2m/TVDFscXV0so2gZI1JWvr62Lis8o3BGPk9Fji 3xVAGqwT4ZtH+jjMu99lWfX1aw7J/wug94npwE0TDIgj8vlHWfkqMVYIV0f8phiFs4Io koag== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=8J4LWeIf4HI5SxsyAfrOW1Gdhy5FphUlk/m+Mhc7T2w=; b=efh7w3SO8bMfN7ME6ti1Rz8FegJFt3A+ku/Kas7h7bICCmvWVP6xGWDvgav6g4SmpG xhG1VS8Svb/L9VmFlXG0fxUooUcQSrG7lrwPvn1Q9KO3mAcrg1Jq3yLOE8j14H/8WngW byRh/CmuRmOyrzY8BJfnIhXS31ZSXOyCsTpufsaRvJyeJPWMNkPYOz4i6ZJWOYH/lnub yiCQH2im0aF8AhFfSSrzPRD7QZ5HXSLEfobFWgO0FaHyWCkpgJ7ExrFNs2PaHzPqrGXJ raX2o+ZyRbgcBROGxTJZzd4/cMQytfdjn/2LR9NJG2x658Qh0DSfzkBNoOCkGt0pzYxE kCXA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530YBAn4tT2BOVPrKw9rd7inMhA0w/6QxbFWOQXfyHgYKRFoonoi WH/aFchOnyIusfWnN8aT3nU1QxZM1ps53ZIWblddNfZs X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxKCANzVbjnoWtRZVTFEEI7cbKJZDrMJScnGp9n8VBRLPPEWivfD63XwY2V4IMWqqtqv1YSv75hB0YvcjgHYX8= X-Received: by 2002:a37:54f:: with SMTP id 76mr21282193qkf.479.1628015414399; Tue, 03 Aug 2021 11:30:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Gilberto Ferreira Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2021 15:29:42 -0300 Message-ID: To: "pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com" X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 1.132 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT 0.25 Envelope-from freemail username ends in digit FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: [pve-devel] Proxmox + VDO X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2021 18:30:23 -0000 Hi there... Does anyone here already try to implement some sort of VDO mapper to use in conjunction with Proxmox VE?? Thanks --- Gilberto Nunes Ferreira (47) 99676-7530 - Whatsapp / Telegram