From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C46361749 for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 03:52:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2B5192DD1F for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 03:52:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from sonic317-33.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (sonic317-33.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [66.163.184.44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 34EC82DD08 for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 03:52:50 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1599443562; bh=dsTbnhXcrjn5Ijw+GMvmJKY1G0vGySNKAWZa1f2QYhY=; h=From:Date:Subject:To:References:From:Subject; b=Fr7QIAfb9OMpex4/a9egZZkDwW/042XmvPCpkeY53sst3kHSQ4ZTi9RiEG0BJlEF0SpQYJ+1CCNppIwvv29zd1/XQIiRD2bf9vAOW55SjJsnGGKkrc3U8iVsYAYHzAoD133BurH3+LbGGt+vhOkga9AYUXTJn/lRhdIendhttMMAqsegDbpmLpgSPGv2nAZjF3rxs59sWsFYeht5G+JOSACXYzslpSH6v1bOkfoOu6qMZDmDzdYtOC9jkGMfNrN8pzs9yyanN2Hu0WEA58o8HYvma1RIpvp3c3unCxqy6+3wORzCNh6imulOBhsuXXaCbflp89OmEDYaWv6ptgLWmA== X-YMail-OSG: Sfu9CSEVM1lauQiczeR9aVB2aJIEPlBhPoh3uaJ8ZiwMrF1.ivWxMPFsaOXmCP9 pjQI97Gk4LhrFqp8scukpbWHiym42wCJ_vdnj7WRYLsLwtujz5JAg27ol968ZTfwTkPyT2WUiSRx _098dz4RYybpjyC9aznI4h5hO0QM0G9quOz3NL2u3y5dqpiXW23mAhkz_XYFtiSfsEyFxMc8d7An SH3gdFThkd8hClVa_13l_PXTwBAR5Uzlaf1bOuffio6KLSjuBS7oI.g1vI5t252rSSjgdSeq8Bco uL9gWRA_eF2Ar091UnYmtVrZ5SmnBEPRqY9ujjHl3L6_KsRrNk7l.zvx8qn0Rh5LGVWl05uUBCYG MljqqSc_Rj5PVZz47LGiAlNtFUg46eRXsWWJhnriEahl2Wf6rxh9BysCKyrGNVsD40iAbKLkxTy4 bd90rAKma1pL4rEurwuC5grTogTjWasU4rSJ7LVMardsRLrPyyUB6dWFdjchyzQkmXlEZbP8UjhL zMBU9i1eO9UoGGvZhD957QvKPVccEmR34nTAVQdZL7O.6ZtXWvrju6yVVooxH2cOznWH2Qth2STx dKpQKU0Z1Po.kHtYiJVezuPITcdoBO44EiGoMXXHYpKoh0jUoyUUYU4d.z9zuTN3g48uV8MhX633 bBuglxyyXCBQjt.mtaVGwHAgPPomxRrl8G1ltLfGZeJhiHsu9LIz6vCcS6vXrwedYzxlgNVYm8V6 1AC_Z6M2gf6bz3RhTgViLIyd0BggNcSGHEAlSFyqh0fWpNAOFCoK.0j0buy8IyMsyMsoqKcpxmIb bRr6FEUqpNElnXHNdnYrMveyWNOUKx6ZbQZ71JM8RqLbI_wtXwibX7sgTvy_T_BlJzBJObDrI4wN ER7ItRYToUnTe14MR3Z5VEWGYWW6fN3QHNwjJC.lxKyVOP0shELnCxvSVvX1HXn1cb1IeYDT46fQ u50FR0hGIJ4LHzC3D_kH9SgO7OLNlgT8Jq0I3edb0lB5zf27DJo.xFr1DMLDOjsbuS8OV5Tx8._F leS.8ZwjIUL3I.9wQME7LV0EwQ6xOPJlEKTxjg.533s7HTrPHAKsoNWv2xfl0vp1hQ4ebYYSd1hX CZ3MTlOKCRbAyndJHBJo8VLk4V9sGwCLYo49G14Ze8LjSIpnxzb8DJGf4d0t3RJ49YzMRQNZRaW. xHXxLJD47TkmWlJlfdlG0mDxkZpz60IlHOpz7YMUhta0lMtUMk9g1Wvb5ZFMog_G1apGwFOSY2qW Ps9zfqQFLQqz4XoNQn1eP_odOcFSOywBIzPACdmst6hKd.RVtVDBhn8Y1mv70E5vtphgqqCb5v2r D4Ph4vjWSjr_htNCmEtjsIXVcP4XKMHt0rDjMEHz8Y6_x3qEwAgqPDTRVII_SqntQJiOvOOsjBNE g8pyctAesCgbfzVLDC8qpJBZTtv84DxZmwPpgk37CS4U0r1eVv1uenaELybCgEbCINmxMVUi7Lt2 Pg7tWN.BwwwjFvbVTcitRdDBIAdNR_jp8EJDT2WlM.3JZp6rTeQY1z6H0leM- Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic317.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 01:52:42 +0000 Received: by smtp423.mail.ir2.yahoo.com (VZM Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID a2dad04b18638c47a93e05d418159b6b; Mon, 07 Sep 2020 01:42:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ed1-f43.google.com with SMTP id l17so11149244edq.12 for ; Sun, 06 Sep 2020 18:42:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530CMte0Zf3mCFAl2HuCP/BLHyZ/qp/2aHWZLD8GV34//08mFdJm FEzkmG6RSGqbNE1hnDyc+ebWQPzdle+iu/deYvw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzAMMtEA5/P7+veNIGWytxym3/QXm/j91FjbdnAzHJtWPBLPSUIBw36ZEXcvZGgA4EIBJNtIcfZJHKp+8bljjM= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:144c:: with SMTP id d12mr17439510edx.168.1599442949615; Sun, 06 Sep 2020 18:42:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Victor Hooi Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2020 11:42:18 +1000 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: To: PVE development discussion References: X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.16565 mail.backend.jedi.jws.acl:role.jedi.acl.token.atz.jws.hermes.yahoo Apache-HttpAsyncClient/4.1.4 (Java/11.0.7) X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 -0.001 Average reputation (+2) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: [pve-devel] Telegraf added in-built Proxmox support - thoughts versus our external metric support? X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2020 01:52:52 -0000 Hi, I know that Proxmox has it's own inbuilt InfluxDB client: https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/External_Metric_Server However, Telegraf recently added first-party support for Proxmox: https://github.com/influxdata/telegraf/tree/master/plugins/inputs/proxmox Telegraf lets you output to InfluxDB, Graphite, Prometheus, as well as a bunch of others (Telegraf in-built output clients ) What do you think of using the above and contributing to that, instead of maintaining our own Proxmox InfluxDB support? Or are there advantages to maintaining our own code here? Thanks, Victor