From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF432769B7 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 20:01:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A427298C9 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 20:01:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-il1-x132.google.com (mail-il1-x132.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::132]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 9484F98B4 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 20:01:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-il1-x132.google.com with SMTP id a8so19268171ilj.10 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 11:01:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=4IiaMjRkzJzrWaCXGOX0gX7E7KeKsJcUxzw3e4F0FNo=; b=lM1iPTjhJkYsOvy9kTQ/9ZfFPXoPGGhQf8wVLeUytIciCYhpUJw6Pn/h6jk4G8QKZR C8z1W+Q53pZPEmksIpeMVanPSl7sJ/nMM/VQrwhNIMYZvGCJqyKeP7TJ7o7HLWCEUe1D B5x40+mOIsiG4uAktum/KnVf9GR+Gn1vAf6Z39/GJ/PxmYL5LClgHSS3M07DQZHf51hy pAA5/zHJjjUI5cbBRdEGex2dubsbxbubtdEgsvEuekweP/6+7XaqMB6GncThYUvV2/sM iDMKaKWsPRZpk1+/VhZWJOWcE0S636rn4DOVfeUAwkPH4+c004YAL+Mq8wnlyYJ+rhm+ nRGw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to :from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=4IiaMjRkzJzrWaCXGOX0gX7E7KeKsJcUxzw3e4F0FNo=; b=aZo2lIBY+U3qFKXYa383FuMu6TY7sWbF3pyMkd9Lbg7aPFjLqiOZmnGnHYgyntXZpk 8ZXJAlF+esC9bs8fRCn1Vcv/CIJ0jwPAdwg0uB2ieejZ92OHlyc2w6B5jUTL9IirfnRe 3iQchG79GM6lsM6BGEs0sMP6UzARKTvjQH7YipH9pQRTa9IuMfY48EFnT8SNUuvxCnDo RZbMaHAuY/ErRpFABHXljOC1956WcgIfni86g1tdqXiCyruLuBbCDBi2WEUGQGIHhxoH QOd9BRBuK7SZYUGSJg7bihJYQ6MT8bvjuxkOIE41jLYm22pVbnseJDtrvIpKbK8mI+Kl mTag== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532oMXA6bcTfHOm6X5x3lgalALftf8gluCC4O6wfcMfp7+j4c3wq e2f6EO1zGTcFTXPjSKdtAdRzhXZR7FLHW5WQ4hIab6y05nDm X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxLqBoKlAQzq/e8Gck5PdEckubEj/7PhVD8AMPDWXM6kJRVFYvtr659SsdS7ro+OSBs0jdlaNb46BmQCceSKlw= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:1402:: with SMTP id n2mr18654734ilo.160.1634666471693; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 11:01:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <250ce9d4-6ff9-782e-e3c4-e7e933af7626@proxmox.com> <65ecf123-1411-df36-f32b-50bec27ea26e@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <65ecf123-1411-df36-f32b-50bec27ea26e@proxmox.com> Reply-To: travis@wsor.net From: Travis Osterman Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 13:01:00 -0500 Message-ID: To: Proxmox VE development discussion X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [pve-devel] any plan for zfs over open-iscsi (linux)? X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 18:01:20 -0000 On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 11:56 PM Thomas Lamprecht wrote: > On 18.10.21 20:09, Travis Osterman wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 12:05 AM Thomas Lamprecht < > t.lamprecht@proxmox.com wrote: > >> On 18.10.21 04:04, Travis Osterman wrote: > >>> I think the title says it all. I use open-iscsi for my SAN and wondered > >>> whether there was a plan to support that the way LIO and IET are > >> supported > >>> within Proxmox. Neither LIO or IET are available for my linux > >> distribution > >>> and do not seem to be actively supported. > >>> > >>> I'm not a native perl coder but would happily be a tester for anyone > >>> interested in this feature. If I'm alone, I may start trying to come up > >>> with something. Thanks. > >> > >> I'm only waking up so excuse if I overlook something, but what's wrong > >> with the non-user-mode iSCSI storage type of PVE? > >> > >> https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs/chapter-pvesm.html#storage_open_iscsi > >> > >> > > That does, indeed, work fine. iSCSI over ZFS provides additional support > > for quickly provisioning, snapshotting and rolling back images all > through > > the UI. From what I can see, proxmox connects to the NAS to issue the > > commands to perform those functions. When I use the iSCSI (without ZFS), > I > > have access both proxmox and my NAS. Does that make sense? > > > > Oh, it seems I just somehow missed the "zfs" part yesterday (local) > morning.. > > As we already have the base support for the other target providers it can > make sense to at least evaluate this and if no show-stoppers come up also > integrate it into PVE. > > Can you please open a enhancement request over at: > https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/ > > Some more details regarding your SAN would be also nice to have in that > request, if possible. > > cheers, > Thomas > > > _______________________________________________ > pve-devel mailing list > pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel > > Thanks, Thomas. I also incorrectly wrote "open-iscsi" which is my typical iscsi client instead of "TGTD" which is my SAN target provider. I've submitted an enhancement request, linked below. https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3685 Thanks for your consideration.