From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F39476438 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 20:10:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7BCD4250D0 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 20:09:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-io1-xd29.google.com (mail-io1-xd29.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d29]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id D2A02250B8 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 20:09:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-io1-xd29.google.com with SMTP id b188so12431759iof.8 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 11:09:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=7HB9BDktWwtUwkdnzHhjlFZ/6OGwFYy6p0LTD9Krfnc=; b=AyV8RskMy2SWXh0mqv/VOQsciMgyR6c9BUJMicCE1RnQwhKREw421WcWEhOPmpLb7Y ncUT9RShiU2Ja3xLPg2J06yIl+o/9JiI/ujDew/6fcTf0UcDOckgvGyjMDJ153sa0W21 kkPrwq6ozRoimDF6iZdXCbB1QlSWoBsdWt5NVApykWP1v7RXe7F2A14Hv3LK0jRKlLoN yu/gmVYp4GaWS4ma7KA8vIHjaNui/bYW51LTgkslZkW4iST9RdJkFIgruojVhlla1ZwP 5ZZv40nK3SFzHDgdETdxFroH+u7aGlMvHMh1jzAfksjwfmzRoABgQLm1F8K/hksmcivn fSlw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=7HB9BDktWwtUwkdnzHhjlFZ/6OGwFYy6p0LTD9Krfnc=; b=EqVyysTvkIITGoxI+TZwWmaTwN30ltin/vS1V6S55pRBE0pcZ0abHFmG9VJgTqrsEE t8XK+HYFT5bc869AzgceEArR7L5cIHS2bSKrGnz0iuv7A7W6i87hdN4dxETgNto4r5i7 4cQDaoZNlkHuZuIgiYY4InKNHcl87f8wDvAuwiJviXQ25orZKTozUIoEnmCmI8Uu/Lc7 0g8nR1gXI20hAxAEwuwUvHjJIWog9mgi2TQWDIpEZhFDNHCxVHRvmGthOKH84WgJdpGZ BrhF51VmhffyMta+OsmyXnjXHxdD1WfvAYSTie2WpuTZDvrZEsazvZ2A4JYZIaiLaDNM N6mw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533k/BImdn2yRYMOro/tAqvSNC9tX8v4537xVdD21WJfsSvncXQC soVcqq4t7vbEx8NU8/fCFUhS4Z5uW9BPqjaEzA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxL6+VWZHwacNop5fFzhIuLQz4ZA2ZXCsH9ZSr3OTcX8Eg5RxXwFjeO4xMdsGYRg0GATH2eFzTvfIQuTuoDHXU= X-Received: by 2002:a02:cdc2:: with SMTP id m2mr972442jap.52.1634580565217; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 11:09:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <250ce9d4-6ff9-782e-e3c4-e7e933af7626@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <250ce9d4-6ff9-782e-e3c4-e7e933af7626@proxmox.com> Reply-To: travis@wsor.net From: Travis Osterman Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 13:09:13 -0500 Message-ID: To: Thomas Lamprecht Cc: travis@wsor.net, Proxmox VE development discussion X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [pve-devel] any plan for zfs over open-iscsi (linux)? X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 18:10:04 -0000 On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 12:05 AM Thomas Lamprecht wrote: > Hi, > > On 18.10.21 04:04, Travis Osterman wrote: > > I think the title says it all. I use open-iscsi for my SAN and wondered > > whether there was a plan to support that the way LIO and IET are > supported > > within Proxmox. Neither LIO or IET are available for my linux > distribution > > and do not seem to be actively supported. > > > > I'm not a native perl coder but would happily be a tester for anyone > > interested in this feature. If I'm alone, I may start trying to come up > > with something. Thanks. > > I'm only waking up so excuse if I overlook something, but what's wrong > with the non-user-mode iSCSI storage type of PVE? > > https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs/chapter-pvesm.html#storage_open_iscsi > > cheers, > Thomas > > That does, indeed, work fine. iSCSI over ZFS provides additional support for quickly provisioning, snapshotting and rolling back images all through the UI. From what I can see, proxmox connects to the NAS to issue the commands to perform those functions. When I use the iSCSI (without ZFS), I have access both proxmox and my NAS. Does that make sense?