From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBB57695F5 for ; Sun, 6 Dec 2020 20:41:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id DBF511D00F for ; Sun, 6 Dec 2020 20:41:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-qv1-xf34.google.com (mail-qv1-xf34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f34]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 0738F1CFFA for ; Sun, 6 Dec 2020 20:41:21 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-qv1-xf34.google.com with SMTP id q7so5522848qvt.12 for ; Sun, 06 Dec 2020 11:41:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ayufan-eu.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=UyU9VyAKs0U2ZcBjT1U+UhtDKVCiPfAqtZw5oc7xBSk=; b=ripVKQnSMgyiKljjkwYUXaOSdXwsKRhtkAfsFTJ6BZIzchOZ6L77W6WEKxOCua/Swo 1r+FYNqZ6MM9XarwvR3UijsgA6v5KFgpsSXqsEiWU6j24m2qqOfyQEm1/zbdQeNngNAB 06Ik/r36Zn8aTIdn/H3FwjxV09RE6yxXmEIqYneBnvGAJo1/33oNd7Wa/2anidf4EwoP c5ji9Gi2IEeHlOBoorCDOOmDqepCQgH1EB9SbIXxWvaAFusJZXJDWv8viCEU1WyhTJtx DXcVwobzC0RG0L4eC8jica3XpvseVUxlhdy6k158F/sL6+EJjbFzdUL7wt8rCwAltS0O m4mw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=UyU9VyAKs0U2ZcBjT1U+UhtDKVCiPfAqtZw5oc7xBSk=; b=fHO3wLZJ74OHRpVd6byb8ZL002f6X2Fn0GrzMbxxzayO4l3ybAYG6WWewfwhkEGi7x eCk8ORoI4mx+jv62vdT99Nri+lH6+97dm8gr/cLTa4mRc8qyVjN3nqhqL2zDiBTyKPxM UXfVXxI9Otipef6ngAA/klcNRUZl68zn6culx2I0lc6h2zOi/UiUXHEr/Cefq1Cd6clt 86ieNsYGyQZRyJoZ8oqU9B+jpPpFwwV4HjQfsCvewh8iHyxTwNan/ZTiRDzP5XolPgnC 6giXGcGwsMmX7LLQIOO33TNXO4TLr2FsTEtM9piKYZ/gMUFq4y3M7VH5hQwL7r5qxnW4 gJLA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530NJ1ShdD9xECbmCoe/n5BOXmTa2eRwXXVVeNXscSuHM7+B+Lb6 bKMs/IVqufNEPQKQjOHm/eCNyg3eT0kgbDWripgBMiPCmbWJXQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwwuwidW2zFiMuyK713aBWbuNLtM0hkF+phzcwFRRWT4otyW6Cw0sjr2UUA6IO6j4X/peOmES/Q+l0leRzju5c= X-Received: by 2002:ad4:5886:: with SMTP id dz6mr17724822qvb.10.1607283673231; Sun, 06 Dec 2020 11:41:13 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: =?UTF-8?Q?Kamil_Trzci=C5=84ski?= Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2020 20:41:02 +0100 Message-ID: To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.125 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message KAM_NUMSUBJECT 0.5 Subject ends in numbers excluding current years RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_NONE 0.001 SPF: sender does not publish an SPF Record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [crates.io] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [pve-devel] Compiling PBS on arm64 X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2020 19:41:22 -0000 I'm slightly progressing, but I stumbled across some `debcargo` problem. It appears that Proxmox uses their own fork of `debcargo`, which is needed in order to build crates without the usage of crates.io. Is this patch published somewhere? rust-debcargo (2.4.2-pve1) proxmox-rust; urgency=3Dmedium * allow overriding maintainer via debcargo.toml * implement local crate support.patch -- Proxmox Support Team Tue, 14 Jan 2020 16:13:48 +0100 On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 4:21 PM Kamil Trzci=C5=84ski wrot= e: > ARM64 is becoming increasingly popular, especially that PBS seems at leas= t > for my usage-pattern to be ideal to run on my arm64 NAS. In the end > I want to try to be able to recompile everything for arm64 and see how > nicely > it works there. > > But first I decided to try to compile all packages for `amd64`. And I'm > scratching my head > to try to do that. This proves to be super hard due to multitude of > dependencies that are backported, > unordered, and require a very special set of commands to be executed > depending on a git repo > since PBS is rust-based. > > Do you maybe happen to have a comprehensive guide that allows you to > compile everything > from the scratch without the use of `/devel` repo, ideally with some kind > of CI scripts that would do this heavy lifting? > > Kamil Trzci=C5=84ski > > >