From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C3F776CBD for ; Sat, 17 Jul 2021 17:25:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2999E1A03F for ; Sat, 17 Jul 2021 17:24:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-vk1-xa2d.google.com (mail-vk1-xa2d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a2d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 07E711A02A for ; Sat, 17 Jul 2021 17:24:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-vk1-xa2d.google.com with SMTP id d7so2836573vkf.2 for ; Sat, 17 Jul 2021 08:24:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=l/2E2FF7m1tn/VWvRlgJf6OuaMfxq2Q3zwv6Gm7JR3c=; b=Wqv6/VpjQApauMYfNHIiyljejAphXtB5COuH+cEqe9pl2t2RXitATcLS3MRcSJiY+J homYp0bGwsJc9/UvfR/yfrXNnAcKinEKlXVOHeIDn/YcfG3u5nEEpsqYNLIiJ1n81Vgo N3zfqxwzETKPJaJb4iww9UIEut8tw/bQK5FqVhmVW++FJd2PPpjVWHC4aUHk+nlVkJ3F rf70EPSxLL8Y8B4uOXiNJ+AGmr9OR8F3lENdX4h+IUbT1oKDze6zaltg3h9FoFpZRbp6 smrOPtiR8GMnU9rhhLnWdy6T/iMQAJL3mHsvWRBY6/rJHiXD5DxuRsMtEUlLWIq7tTL+ VTmw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=l/2E2FF7m1tn/VWvRlgJf6OuaMfxq2Q3zwv6Gm7JR3c=; b=WCCx3zrQr+ynwc1tqHcXGjCoEdJ4eGWeBDeAeoJvSvdIBV3v+bievW2O/s30lFgt62 7YgznMIPv3Dv3klW32dilm+HHJdMbxF/ASA8SdHMu5TqqxhSmzxUjD5zJjEvCdweGh3h pYw0jTbbTXSjNFCq8saoW/p4m6aJc7Pnj5JW/zfy5HpIPiZf920ZZDlreg14hsO7sRJw x0acf5oucarKNdKKqWpkXYn7zfydsGSsnfTE6z/9IHRvIdc4cTJMcHohfYQSExqAu80K JB2d6uOJB4gwG2w997niuVWrNE1qRx9iLUJqKsCgfmgfk6E2W7TbWnCGpntmG/JsWC9A Deyg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5339/JaEoMQH2u7Q+MELjIoy0kG2Md618qWPa0sJme2HDNdv6nZP uPxDDZVXFjugcDviDBi8EmZ/IWAjIf3i5miJf3TcifU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyxiXOQxxh+Hs00W9bMGkJyx0moKLjJXFvAQs9z1GTVKbc/cH51HJSu9BK96JD1Nm58bgZoEAV/Pn1DT07yENA= X-Received: by 2002:ac5:c808:: with SMTP id y8mr16163086vkl.16.1626535486423; Sat, 17 Jul 2021 08:24:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Alex K Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2021 18:24:34 +0300 Message-ID: To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.111 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: [pve-devel] Glusterfs multiple secondary servers X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2021 15:25:25 -0000 Hi, I have a replica 3 gluster storage hosted from the same proxmox nodes. When adding the gluster volume I would like to define two secondary servers instead of one, as follows: backup-volfile-servers=node1,node2 It seems this is not supported from the UI, as I get the following error: Parameter verification failed. (400) *server2*: invalid format - value does not look like a valid server name or IP address How is this case supported? A replica 3 gluster setup is very common. Many thanks, Alex