From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79E4D68CD1 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 08:39:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 69D7818AC1 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 08:39:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-vs1-xe2f.google.com (mail-vs1-xe2f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 4987218AAA for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 08:39:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-vs1-xe2f.google.com with SMTP id p13so540171vsg.2 for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 23:39:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=MJH49tFiqNGPoo8NPfHyXhaAkDaMOvIKjdj4A4zaX9U=; b=Vf/0kxw9yhJD8Xzs9g6gUQsZIG5PNHoPSACkVJElNyLJZc/L4w2sfDYg1AKDNc8ssQ 9nQSkL3VDiIye/Uu+7MDOkcd1LwTKEcy+sDBuKVuuCGYyIZ6Pf4HOFSYgxpqFvZz1DSB iy2ZnCWOHehpO3XaCdoQ9CQnesX73vKZikr8gRikFNIAeN5V6h+ODnG1xH6qyG3WjwgC BYP5BFTMCy1QUT7UWEQHwxm1RsmfICJVIuDQl2ZYZt2+YYGvRf5bVLdAbqN0iPC9UkYN S4OdzvMZ1TcKe+5O7IEN/nG4QS3gjUp2HjjQoH4CUFeKTp1oUJ87ArCeNqkYDXuTrfL3 7MNQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=MJH49tFiqNGPoo8NPfHyXhaAkDaMOvIKjdj4A4zaX9U=; b=W+forZzDXroIv+SYuGeE1tMlMVO5VHkt5xUsXrkno/rBlPwXJZ16zc/mmjI9xz2cb3 kwqBsYmDQmaZHMUikea2iWP8jQjJZJKt2Ky+86GV7rKiTL/VV8LdNDApzCXhBgu3aTyd 0cjYoIVUFzRF+bsgQw5xtetqB3Lt1FTivkazwZWcrPyVa5tBKdr4uONhWA7yfYCy1vFD dvCA9muS4bVL7ngNhgDgnQmnL/bvSgG/oMOHjtN4pR5xkS64GNM51ddUjkfLxUcqmg40 85jSq4xY1408dDjCMZVkM+v4LIMFUlrSJ5LvIr9zGnZf5CR072IlViHQMT+YMoA7RJVl N8tA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531sg/s4aktCzwKu6s3Jz+d3/oDT/pQA72CFOCkscxmYUFIQyxBC t6JoC9KzF9PObk/wysYgLeLcTKfttTIoS6yr9T987r52Lw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyn2KNMhRDv/ihFe/e18ZHKqY4BV3coz4umpirvsLdueld1dkijcIFV/OVCPa34xAAgk1p5ZIKFNtLaJ9Ygj24= X-Received: by 2002:a67:7d8b:: with SMTP id y133mr3133855vsc.59.1627022353868; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 23:39:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Alex K Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 09:39:02 +0300 Message-ID: To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.090 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [pve-devel] Glusterfs multiple secondary servers X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 06:39:52 -0000 Gentle reminder. I tried also to locate the part at the source code which handles the glusterfs mounts without success. Appreciate any feedback. Alex On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 6:24 PM Alex K wrote: > Hi, > > I have a replica 3 gluster storage hosted from the same proxmox nodes. > When adding the gluster volume I would like to define two secondary servers > instead of one, as follows: > > backup-volfile-servers=node1,node2 > > It seems this is not supported from the UI, as I get the following error: > > Parameter verification failed. (400) > *server2*: invalid format - value does not look like a valid server name > or IP address > > How is this case supported? A replica 3 gluster setup is very common. > > Many thanks, > Alex > >