From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 682C763703 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 09:46:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5563224192 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 09:46:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pg1-x52f.google.com (mail-pg1-x52f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 014E02417E for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 09:46:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pg1-x52f.google.com with SMTP id l191so4135345pgd.5 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 00:46:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=qqZKZXVTLFLJsatDpSSIfaA1l5ZlEDqwAv5RM+tfU3E=; b=qVg4/nJXa/PBgDo+hssgETaZOkBraL9Dn+RgWYHV+20Zh3X5odjplvAGFMztk5qqcE aLGKG2oeNfVAiskSe3y561nvyG9jwPOPNsqYqVo+pR9t9qn/3PyxEM5zD14L2qFpbOE1 5b6WCRRHZCSsmHcpMEgq36AMkkwAbflbuTNtngvzlU98Y5Pwk+BqJN0x88vSZyCcoN9K iYaetNVew3xXzTXjYcI49sWhDYAyVYA6m/rLKxuLbDbJL4qZlkZB+yRNiD/cz7UBArLN AO/ShNBJKC5bIsKiBDgrr8anpbMWcQ+SmSa9EjEJD+Iw0UtWDljchd4MDYcYtuu4zw76 JEhg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=qqZKZXVTLFLJsatDpSSIfaA1l5ZlEDqwAv5RM+tfU3E=; b=UieoWMG7ykFbJSXiWqlzcvGutXRlAuqDaOL9N6jjDPj4CUYIhdhPWe3uR/+ipIvnd7 wkiRXfzVyx2rqebsJPiBeT2pFAJ0GZu0Nqvl6OSZejvxiUgGwyrXSBxLUMAx+v24azrL 7qtWie7BFxBcNJ74WVOAye3153zl+e+resrU8GQL3eO9qXejcSLAlSuAHmCkJYhaqOcR QgmxrJR+61RK5kcA6hZj2Wp85WFYzw+USo1QrIyEAGDA0j+fN2mfE/ayr8HXSuoHHqLv 0f88ye4tB0gGSiRJEYmy7K3aWebCMalYGRm46IU0pfxTIVrYd8irw8ER01rU3G32Evel CcYQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5300BjbeDHlGHMmarzmSoobMnfENgzUWPhmZCLmkIpmGB3JA/zRC PP4xNRWmEDjYeY/F8BtOIye1pX2MN5QcbzXsIyapvB/Xr20= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxlTbHKsNRjbWuNq4e09FLmyfmLfegJyS2hBbxYCCIxG1zZiCNwG/lvignS8NXuT11/x/PXbA+karB6RE9sMKo= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:8d94:: with SMTP id v20mr6585821plo.298.1598341574658; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 00:46:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1494951154.2394588.1597820244987.JavaMail.zimbra@odiso.com> <890410297.26903.1598340513251.JavaMail.zimbra@odiso.com> In-Reply-To: <890410297.26903.1598340513251.JavaMail.zimbra@odiso.com> From: Thomas G Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 09:46:03 +0200 Message-ID: To: Proxmox VE development discussion X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT 0.25 Envelope-from freemail username ends in digit FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [pve-devel] does somebody have an hetzner or ovh server to do test ? X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 07:46:54 -0000 Hello, OVH provide Proxmox for their dedicated server offer. You should ask for free temporary servers, it's at least the minimum than they could do to support the open source community. Thomas. On Tue, Aug 25, 2020, 09:28 Alexandre DERUMIER wrote: > Hi Stephan, > > Thanks for the help > > >>What would you like to test? If it does not disturb my production > >>servers, then I think I can help you. > > I would like to do a lot of setup test, so I'll break your production ;) > I'm going to test routed setup, but also bgp-evpn,etc... > I have a friend working at ovh, I'll try to have some server to test. > but thanks anyway. > > > >>They both have 16 failover ip addresses. I have once tested the failove= r > >>of the complete /28 block and - although there are costs involved - it > >>works. > > Interesting, you have failover le full /28 block between server ? > If yes, do you have done it manually ? or through the api ? > (In the future, I would like to implemented auto failover with > keepalived/vrrp or something like that) > > > ----- Mail original ----- > De: "Stephan Leemburg" > =C3=80: "Proxmox VE development discussion" > Envoy=C3=A9: Samedi 22 Ao=C3=BBt 2020 18:01:16 > Objet: Re: [pve-devel] does somebody have an hetzner or ovh server to do > test ? > > Hi Alexandre, > > Sorry for the late reply. > > But actually, I do have 2 OVH based subscribed proxmox systems. > > They both have 16 failover ip addresses. I have once tested the failover > of the complete /28 block and - although there are costs involved - it > works. > > What would you like to test? If it does not disturb my production > servers, then I think I can help you. > > Kind regards, > > Met vriendelijke groet, > Stephan Leemburg > IT Functions > > e: sleemburg@it-functions.nl > p: +31 (0)71 889 23 33 > m: +31(0)6 83 22 30 69 > kvk: 27313647 > > On 19-08-2020 08:57, Alexandre DERUMIER wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm currently looking to test ip failover (single /32 ip or subnet > range) > > on public provider like hetzner or ovh. > > > > I have see a lot of users asking questions on the forum about routed > setup. > > > > /32 is a bit tricky with point to point configuration, > > > > and I'll would like to implement them in sdn configuration (as I'm > working on ip management). > > > > > > I just need a small server, 1 single failover /32 ip and 1 small > failover subnet. > > > > > > If nobody can help, no problem, I'll rent a small server for 1 month. > > > > > > Alexandre > > > > > > (BTW: I'll try to send a new sdn patch series next week, I'm currently > working on ip dns api registration) > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > pve-devel mailing list > > pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com > > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel > > > > _______________________________________________ > pve-devel mailing list > pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel > > > _______________________________________________ > pve-devel mailing list > pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel >