From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9])
by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAD171FF189
for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Fri, 4 Apr 2025 12:56:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 18EB81C646;
Fri, 4 Apr 2025 12:55:51 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <9f0eb0fa-13b5-4df7-adaf-904046a3317e@proxmox.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2025 12:55:48 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
Gabriel Goller <g.goller@proxmox.com>
References: <20250328171340.885413-1-g.goller@proxmox.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Hannes Duerr <h.duerr@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20250328171340.885413-1-g.goller@proxmox.com>
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0
AWL 0.033 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy
HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message
KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
Validity was blocked. See
https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
information.
RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
Validity was blocked. See
https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
information.
RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
Validity was blocked. See
https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
information.
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH cluster/docs/manager/network/proxmox{, -ve-rs,
-firewall, -perl-rs} 00/52] Add SDN Fabrics
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
On 3/28/25 18:12, Gabriel Goller wrote:
> This series allows the user to add fabrics such as OpenFabric and OSPF over
> their clusters.
>
> Overview
> ========
>
> This series allows the user to create routed networks ('fabrics') across their
> clusters, which can be used as the underlay network for a EVPN cluster, or for
> creating Ceph full mesh clusters easily.
>
> This patch series adds the initial support for two routing protocols:
> * OpenFabric
> * OSPF
>
> In the future we plan on moving the existing IS-IS and BGP controllers into the
> fabric structure. There are also plans for adding a new Wireguard fabric to
> this.
Very nice feature and from my first impression it works really well!
What I have noticed so far:
1. if you remove interfaces from a node in OSPF you can't add them later
and if you remove the last one you get the following error:
```
Parameter verification failed. (400)
*interfaces*: type check ('array') failed
```
which could be turned into a nicer message or even allowed (why can i
not remove all interfaces for maintenance reasons?).
2. is there a use-case where i do not want to use an interface
`unnumbered` nor with an ip address?
If you also can't think of any i'd suggest restricting it so that the
user has to either tick `unnumbered` or enter an ip address.
I think this would help users starting with OSPF, configuring a node and
wondering why it is not working.
_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel