From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D05A6183F
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu,  3 Dec 2020 16:37:09 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6B0A42C7EF
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu,  3 Dec 2020 16:37:09 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 5C27B2C7E3
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu,  3 Dec 2020 16:37:08 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2A291440DE
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu,  3 Dec 2020 16:37:08 +0100 (CET)
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
References: <20201203150140.15040-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <9cb3d543-3733-8449-6dfc-2db08f4d1f62@proxmox.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 16:37:07 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:84.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/84.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20201203150140.15040-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.074 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [pvestatd.pm]
Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH manager] pvestatd: fix container cpuset
 scheduling
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2020 15:37:09 -0000

On 03.12.20 16:01, Dominik Csapak wrote:
> Since pve-container commit
>=20
> c48a25452dccca37b3915e49b7618f6880aeafb1
>=20
> the code to get the cpuset controller path lives in pve-commons PVE::CG=
roup.
> Use that and improve the logging in case some error happens in the futu=
re.
> Such an error will only be logged once per pvestatd run,
> so it does not spam the log.

That was worded confusingly for me, I thought you mean "once per pvestatd=
 update
loop run", but it is actually only the first loop (which I like more ^^)

>=20
> Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
> ---
>  PVE/Service/pvestatd.pm | 8 ++++++--
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>=20
>

applied, thanks!