From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65B011FF15E for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Tue, 11 Mar 2025 15:11:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4205A11CD8; Tue, 11 Mar 2025 15:11:40 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <9c776de3-4115-42c9-a6b8-4fe65216f259@proxmox.com> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 15:11:05 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Beta To: "DERUMIER, Alexandre" <alexandre.derumier@groupe-cyllene.com>, "pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com" <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> References: <20250307122945.307426-1-g.goller@proxmox.com> <qxlna3q2jgdz32mnggazxcs3ijapk3ifhdl5ucsxszjjspg5ho@4f2npflcjb35> <b071a6e9d7e234a14eddabf4f7bd3ce1dbd6167c.camel@groupe-cyllene.com> Content-Language: en-GB From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <b071a6e9d7e234a14eddabf4f7bd3ce1dbd6167c.camel@groupe-cyllene.com> X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.039 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH 1/4] frr: bump from 8.5.2 to 10.2.1 X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com> Hi Alexandre, On 11/03/2025 11:56, DERUMIER, Alexandre wrote: > Personally, I would wait for major pve9 before bumping frr, > > because from my experience, I had a lot of regression with frr, (really > a lot ^_^) Yeah, it's definitively a bigger jump, but having late PVE 8 and future PVE 9 start out with the same FRR version would be nice and should make backporting fixes easier; also PVE 9 should then start out more stable w.r.t. FRR and SDN stack. And yes, we looked into backporting some patches that Gabriel needs for the SDN Fabrics work to the FRR version we had, but too much changed. Also, IIRC updating FRR to newer minor version releases (e.g., from 8.5.2 to 8.5.7) often caused also some regressions, so a bigger jump should make addressing those at least a bit more worthwile; at least that's what I'm hoping ^^ FYI: I just uploaded the build to the pvetest repository, would move it to no-subscription sometime next week, if nothing comes up until then. I can naturally delay the move, or fasten it up, depending on your feedback or if you would like to have some more time, I just would like to move it to no-subscription no later than the 28th March, to ensure it gets long enough time for broad exposure in no-subscription before the next point releases. > and this really need a lot of test with different setup to be sure > everything is working fine with differents setup. > > > I can begin to do test on my production with this version if it can > help That would be really appreciated, thanks. _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel