From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC2921FF171 for ; Fri, 13 Dec 2024 15:50:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id DE65B10EDF; Fri, 13 Dec 2024 15:50:06 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <9b61c54a-74f9-44b5-a451-6ef714a62f07@proxmox.com> Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 15:49:31 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Hannes Duerr References: <20241213143251.190391-1-h.duerr@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Fiona Ebner In-Reply-To: <20241213143251.190391-1-h.duerr@proxmox.com> X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.053 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-docs] ha crs: remove technology preview note of static-load scheduler X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" Am 13.12.24 um 15:32 schrieb Hannes Duerr: > The static load scheduler feature was applied on 17/11/2022 [0] and can > be considered stable now > The timing alone doesn't tell much. While there don't seem to be any real issues with the implementation, it was never fully fleshed out and there are certainly some fundamental improvements that can be made, e.g. consider non-HA guests, improve calculation when there are thousands of services. > [0] https://lore.proxmox.com/pve-devel/20221117140018.105004-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com/ > > Signed-off-by: Hannes Duerr > --- > ha-manager.adoc | 2 -- > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/ha-manager.adoc b/ha-manager.adoc > index 3d6fc4a..666576d 100644 > --- a/ha-manager.adoc > +++ b/ha-manager.adoc > @@ -1053,8 +1053,6 @@ Non-HA-managed services are currently not counted. > Static-Load Scheduler > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > -IMPORTANT: The static mode is still a technology preview. > - > Static usage information from HA services on each node is used to choose a > recovery node. Usage of non-HA-managed services is currently not considered. > _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel