From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a0f:8001:1:32::40]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0D831FF0B0 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2026 11:32:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8423E21621; Fri, 23 Oct 2026 11:32:25 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <9a568339-3f00-48f5-8bbd-82ba66d146f5@proxmox.com> Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2026 11:32:22 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH installer 15/15] tui: network: add bond setup options to advanced network dialog To: Lukas Sichert References: <20261020112327.641633-1-c.heiss@proxmox.com> <20261020112327.641633-16-c.heiss@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Christoph Heiss In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1792747942294 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.238 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment (newer systems) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: HUZGFCS2ZBTKGWCXJ3FI3CKFEO375FKG X-Message-ID-Hash: HUZGFCS2ZBTKGWCXJ3FI3CKFEO375FKG X-MailFrom: c.heiss@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header CC: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Thanks for the review! On 10/22/26 17:40, Lukas Sichert wrote: > The TUI also looks good. Just one problem inline: > [..] > The forms first child gets added with > > .child( > "Management interface", > iface_selection.with_name(Self::MGMT_IFNAME_SELECTVIEW_NAME), > ) > > which is of type NamedView>. But gets replaced > with the output of build_mgmt_ifname_selectview, which is of type > SelectView. In the preview, when opening the advanced > menu and hitting Ok without changing anything, I get the error message > 'Invalid values: failed to retrieve management interface name'. Good catch! I'll fix it for v3. (On a related note: While the typesafe interface of cursive is great, sometimes - in situations like this - it can also be bit of PITA, tbh.)