From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 153289F8B8 for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2023 08:32:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E41A91E48B for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2023 08:32:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2023 08:32:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8FD6446CB2; Tue, 7 Nov 2023 08:32:05 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <99f3dfdd-d369-4f3b-a384-9bf4d61b5ad9@proxmox.com> Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2023 08:32:05 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Beta To: Thomas Lamprecht , Proxmox VE development discussion , Hannes Laimer References: <20231018103427.747129-1-h.laimer@proxmox.com> <20231018103427.747129-3-h.laimer@proxmox.com> <6b1cea90-5f83-4ffe-918a-a09d5e7aa055@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Dominik Csapak In-Reply-To: <6b1cea90-5f83-4ffe-918a-a09d5e7aa055@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.017 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-manager 2/2] ui: add bulk suspend support X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2023 07:32:07 -0000 On 11/6/23 19:32, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: > Am 18/10/2023 um 12:34 schrieb Hannes Laimer: > >> diff --git a/www/manager6/form/VMSelector.js b/www/manager6/form/VMSelector.js >> index d59847f2..ad0bfc03 100644 >> --- a/www/manager6/form/VMSelector.js >> +++ b/www/manager6/form/VMSelector.js >> @@ -233,6 +233,10 @@ Ext.define('PVE.form.VMSelector', { >> case 'stopall': >> statusfilter = 'running'; >> break; >> + case 'suspendall': >> + statusfilter = 'running'; >> + me.getStore().addFilter({ property: 'type', value: /qemu/ }); > > @Dominik: this (as a whole) clashes a bit with your filter-rework for bulk-actions, > would you prefer to get that in earlier or is adapting to this not much work anyway? would not really mind if this patch gets in first, i can adapt to that ;)