From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C53FD626D0 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 14:58:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B34711961B for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 14:57:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [212.186.127.180]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 103FF1960F for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 14:57:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C12B54583E; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 14:57:55 +0200 (CEST) To: Proxmox VE development discussion , =?UTF-8?Q?Ren=c3=a9_Jochum?= References: <66328fcc-2e04-cc56-1c30-b60eb4e9ee51@jochum.dev> <1d6cab4d-d8e1-4a0e-0fdd-496ff1384ee5@jochum.dev> From: Aaron Lauterer Message-ID: <99967138-77bd-ea92-f0d5-14cd9c8434d5@proxmox.com> Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 14:57:51 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1d6cab4d-d8e1-4a0e-0fdd-496ff1384ee5@jochum.dev> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.413 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS 0.8 Spam that uses ascii formatting tricks KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment KAM_SHORT 0.001 Use of a URL Shortener for very short URL NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com, pub.dev] Subject: Re: [pve-devel] Flutter-app: Fingerprinting X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 12:58:27 -0000 Hey! On 9/30/20 1:33 PM, René Jochum wrote: > Does a no response mean - no interest? > Definitely not. Thanks for poking again. If you have some code samples flying around we are happy to take a look at it. No promises though if and when we will implement that. All the best, Aaron > Kind regards, > René > > On 24.09.20 13:16, René Jochum wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I wanted to write my own Flutter based app before you guy's Published >> the App, I wanted to call it "superprox", it should run on Desktop with >> electron, iOS and Android. >> >> Because of that I looked into Fingerprinting of TLS Certs and found a >> solution [0]. >> >> I've extended it to fetch fingerprint's for me, look at my fork at [1] >> it won't work on iOS yet. >> >> I can send code samples If you guys are interested. >> >> Kind regards, >> >> René >> >> 0: https://pub.dev/packages/http_certificate_pinning >> 1: https://github.com/pcdummy/http_certificate_pinning/tree/fingerprint_getter >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> pve-devel mailing list >> pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com >> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel > > > > _______________________________________________ > pve-devel mailing list > pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel >