From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BEB31FF56B for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 15:24:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 13C5212E03; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 15:25:00 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <998214a0-4aac-4372-944f-9c618e027cc7@proxmox.com> Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 15:24:27 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: Dominik Csapak , Proxmox VE development discussion , Markus Frank References: <20240415085002.665246-1-m.frank@proxmox.com> <0f77e682-8177-472b-907f-b1f18be745d3@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Fiona Ebner In-Reply-To: X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.067 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH manager v10 1/2] ui: machine: add viommu ComboBox X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" Am 22.04.24 um 15:16 schrieb Dominik Csapak: > On 4/22/24 15:11, Fiona Ebner wrote: > >> >> Should we display some hint that Intel can/should also be used even if >> you have an AMD? Maybe even just in the text we display, like "Intel >> (also used for AMD)" but hope somebody can come up with something better. >> >> > > mhh.. i mean it is a virtual device, so should we also add this info > for e.g. e1000 devices? > But with Intel/AMD, one is inclined to assume there is a dichotomy. Personally, I'd go in assuming the "Intel" setting is wrong with my AMD CPU and so might many users. > since it's in the advanced section and it is documented in pve-docs, > i'd leave it out here (we can still add a notice later if users > are confused, but most users won't use/need it anyway) Yes, we could also wait. But if the confusion can be avoided/reduced without much effort, I think it's worth doing up-front. _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel