From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D32401FF17A for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2025 16:46:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2D9A5FD00; Tue, 11 Nov 2025 16:47:02 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <9959a910-d77f-4ea0-af17-42059ef35683@proxmox.com> Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2025 16:46:49 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Beta To: Alex Goodkind , pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com References: <20251111071450.10188-1-alex@goodkind.io> <20251111071450.10188-2-alex@goodkind.io> Content-Language: en-US From: Thomas Lamprecht In-Reply-To: <20251111071450.10188-2-alex@goodkind.io> X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1762875986684 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.024 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH container 1/1] fix #5538: network: enable accept_ra for DHCPv6 configurations X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Cc: tarick@bedeir.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" Am 11.11.25 um 08:14 schrieb Alex Goodkind: > DHCPv6 requires Router Advertisements to function as specified in > the IPv6 standard. Previously, accept_ra was only enabled for 'auto' > mode, causing DHCPv6 configurations to fail when RAs were needed. > > Enable accept_ra for both 'auto' and 'dhcp' IPv6 modes. > Many thanks for your patch, looks alright. Would you mind sending in a signed CLA [0] for this? I know the change itself is relatively trivial, but we rather want to stay on the safe side here. [0]: https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Developer_Documentation#Software_License_and_Copyright _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel