From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <m.heiserer@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B90A6C617
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 11:03:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id AF37121B4
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 11:03:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 0C4E321A6
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 11:03:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D0A9940AA9;
 Mon, 11 Apr 2022 11:03:34 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <9881cc3c-e316-2f8d-2be4-cb36e3161045@proxmox.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 11:03:33 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.7.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Laurent GUERBY <laurent@guerby.net>
References: <CAEHqL6fgfPmDGhhCwZsRybmPpuBvpBk9VGp-CMwDouPKNvGMRQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <1649408819.6346.22.camel@guerby.net>
From: Matthias Heiserer <m.heiserer@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <1649408819.6346.22.camel@guerby.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 1.493 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -3.086 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] New API endpoint to manage snippets / bugzilla 2208
 / updated patch but missing something, need help
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 09:03:35 -0000

Hi,

please take a look at our developer documentation.
https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Developer_Documentation

Using `git format-patch` makes applying the changes a whole lot easier :)

As far as I can tell from a quick test, your changes seem to work.
Would you mind using `pvesh create` to test?

If it doesn't work there either, make sure to include the exact 
command/code you used so people can try to reproduce the problem.