From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 524E6631EA for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 12:55:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3B8E41C1A5 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 12:54:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx0.it-functions.nl (mx0.it-functions.nl [178.32.167.210]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 56BFF1C198 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 12:54:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.100.26.194] (helo=daruma-old.hachimitsu.nl) by mx0.it-functions.nl with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kAA7i-0002Hh-00 for pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 12:54:46 +0200 Received: from [192.168.254.32] by daruma-old.hachimitsu.nl with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1kAA7f-0006MX-Aq; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 12:54:43 +0200 To: Dietmar Maurer , Proxmox VE development discussion References: <1877466395.127.1598159022900@webmail.proxmox.com> <292235591.128.1598159408132@webmail.proxmox.com> <15c9ed01-6e88-b3c6-6efd-cb5c881904fb@it-functions.nl> <169647259.135.1598192643864@webmail.proxmox.com> <4da8f252-3599-6af2-f398-3c7ac0010045@it-functions.nl> <41585d8d-d0be-3c71-b2fa-380731133fe7@it-functions.nl> <522191112.137.1598244794966@webmail.proxmox.com> From: Stephan Leemburg Organization: IT Functions Message-ID: <97fb389a-daae-2787-eac1-39ed2ac23be4@it-functions.nl> Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 12:54:43 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <522191112.137.1598244794966@webmail.proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: nl X-Scan-Signature: 452fc37de380b7443aba383ffa1dfabe X-GeoIP: NL X-Virus-Scanned: by clamav-new X-Scan-Signature: d5ee4256f8d5822e7b34f2513a5d1048 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.134 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -1.381 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record T_SPF_PERMERROR 0.01 SPF: test of record failed (permerror) Subject: Re: [pve-devel] More than 10 interfaces in lxc containers X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 10:55:17 -0000 On 24-08-2020 06:53, Dietmar Maurer wrote: >> If I don't put a tag on the device, it seems to behave like a trunk. So, >> that would solve my problem. _If_ the hosts where openvswitch enabled. > I am unable to see why you need openvswitch for that? This also works with > standard linux network. Hi Dietmar, Oh, that is new for me. So, I can have a vlan aware traditional bridge in the firewall that receives tagged frames and at the same time have the clients on the specific 'vlans' receive non-tagged frames for their respective pvid? How can this be configured in Proxmox? Kind regards, Stephan