From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36CFC735DD for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2021 12:40:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2338D8B27 for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2021 12:40:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 6797F8B02 for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2021 12:40:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 38FBD40E3D for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2021 12:40:10 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <975df09f-e974-554f-2c83-5e012729090d@proxmox.com> Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2021 12:39:52 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:90.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/90.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Stoiko Ivanov References: <20210706095026.3785241-1-s.ivanov@proxmox.com> From: Thomas Lamprecht In-Reply-To: <20210706095026.3785241-1-s.ivanov@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.514 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [lvmplugin.pm, proxmox.com] Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH storage] lvm: wipe signatures on lvcreate X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2021 10:40:41 -0000 On 06.07.21 11:50, Stoiko Ivanov wrote: > With PVE 7.0 we use upstream's lvm2 packages, which seem to detect > 'more' signatures (and refuse creating lvs when they are present) > > This prevents creating new disks on LVM (thick) storages as reported > on pve-user [0]. > > Adding -Wy to wipe signatures, and --yes (to actually wipe them > instead of prompting) fixes the aborted lvcreate. > > Adding only to LVMPlugin and not to the lvcreate calls in > LvmThinPlugin, since I assume (and my quick tests confirm) that thin > pools are not affected by this issue.. > > Tested on a virtual test-setup with a LVM storage on a (virtual) iscsi > target and a local lvmthin storage. > > [0] https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/2021-July/172660.html > > Signed-off-by: Stoiko Ivanov > --- > PVE/Storage/LVMPlugin.pm | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > applied, thanks!