From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CB2361486
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 17:06:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0ED361C6EA
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 17:06:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 17:06:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4592A44416
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 17:06:55 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <973161c1-8ad5-4c56-9f5d-1ea8639d00cc@proxmox.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 17:06:53 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-GB
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 =?UTF-8?Q?Fabian_Gr=C3=BCnbichler?= <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
References: <20230718091102.6631-1-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
 <20230718091102.6631-2-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230718091102.6631-2-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.076 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH pmg-api] handle pve-kernel -> proxmox-kernel
 rename
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 15:06:56 -0000

On 18/07/2023 11:10, Fabian Grünbichler wrote:

> diff --git a/src/PMG/CLI/pmg7to8.pm b/src/PMG/CLI/pmg7to8.pm
> index 85e9f16..8cccde1 100644
> --- a/src/PMG/CLI/pmg7to8.pm
> +++ b/src/PMG/CLI/pmg7to8.pm
> @@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ sub check_pmg_packages {
>  	}
>  
>  	# FIXME: better differentiate between 6.2 from bullseye or bookworm
> -	my ($krunning, $kinstalled) = (qr/6\.(?:2\.(?:[2-9]\d+|1[6-8]|1\d\d+)|5)[^~]*$/, 'pve-kernel-6.2');
> +	my ($krunning, $kinstalled) = (qr/6\.(?:2\.(?:[2-9]\d+|1[6-8]|1\d\d+)|5)[^~]*$/, 'proxmox-kernel-6.2');

this looses backwards compat though?

Makes update harder as we need to coordinate closely moving packages around..
Same for PBS and PVE.