From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC8B690FCF for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2023 09:53:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B2ED4E2FF for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2023 09:53:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2023 09:53:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 011F444855 for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2023 09:53:09 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <96ec7232-0c5c-bb91-04c4-d92b8bfd5eb0@proxmox.com> Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 09:53:08 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.8.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Wolfgang Bumiller Cc: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com References: <20230223170302.3014798-1-f.weber@proxmox.com> <20230316135936.hhr7jmw5nnkhdqa5@casey.proxmox.com> <20230316160943.n4ys2xfuyl3tl2ii@casey.proxmox.com> From: Friedrich Weber In-Reply-To: <20230316160943.n4ys2xfuyl3tl2ii@casey.proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.419 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH container] lxc start: warn in case of conflicting lxc.idmap entries X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 08:53:39 -0000 On 16/03/2023 17:09, Wolfgang Bumiller wrote: > Since it's about helping out users, even better would be to collect all > the errors together and than die() with a message containing all of > them. > And then the order doesn't matter again ;-) Agree. :) So I'll prepare a v2 that * is based on the sorting approach you suggested * reports all errors to the user (hopefully without being too verbose) * and probably removes the weird "<100 entries" limitation