From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77FC27513C for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 17:24:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 622BC2F083 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 17:24:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 43F072F073 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 17:24:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1898C45D7E for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 17:24:11 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <9325c82b-3e99-d91e-b1e6-3ddf8a396df9@proxmox.com> Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 17:24:10 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:94.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/94.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Aaron Lauterer , Stefan Reiter References: <20211011125520.1124937-1-s.reiter@proxmox.com> <54905ea8-87f9-6cdb-17c1-de312aece9ec@proxmox.com> From: Thomas Lamprecht In-Reply-To: <54905ea8-87f9-6cdb-17c1-de312aece9ec@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.206 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH 0/3] Windows 11 OS type and UI improvements X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 15:24:42 -0000 On 12.10.21 15:51, Aaron Lauterer wrote: > Works. As discussed off list, we should make it clearer in the "System" > panel, that the TPM and EFI disk settings (Storage selection and such) belong > to those "Checkboxes". While it is somewhat clear if enabled manually, it is > quite confusing with them already enabled because one chose Win11 as guest OS > in the previous step. as dicussed off-list, I'd just extend the field labels for the respective storage selector. - "EFIvars Storage" - "TPM Storage" > Additionally, setting the RAM to a default of 4096 for Win11 guests might be > a good idea, as the Win11 installer will refuse to install because the > requirements are not met if there is not enough RAM. A too small disk > (<52GiB) will cause a warning in the Disk selection dialog of the installer, > but it will still install. Yes, thought about that too when running into the very dubious and unhelpful "your system does not fulfill the min reqs. but we won't tell you why" the first time. With the new OS type we can default to 4 GiB memory and 64 GiB root disk for win11 in addtion to the defaults changed here. > > Besides that: > > Tested-By: Aaron Lauterer > thanks, those tags are always valuable!