From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a0f:8001:1:32::40]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A191B1FF0E1 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2026 14:48:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 70DDF21450; Mon, 13 Jul 2026 14:48:41 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <900bc845-b66e-4c8f-bf30-539c5dba0cbd@proxmox.com> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2026 14:48:38 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH qemu-server v2 1/3] cpu config: disable vmx-mbec flag for machine versions < 11.0 To: Friedrich Weber , pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com References: <20260713124025.121154-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> <20260713124025.121154-2-f.ebner@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Fiona Ebner In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1783946903346 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.331 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment (newer systems) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW -0.7 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: X2NPQPZQQ3VP42TUGJEWBMHY6MGDIU37 X-Message-ID-Hash: X2NPQPZQQ3VP42TUGJEWBMHY6MGDIU37 X-MailFrom: f.ebner@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Am 13.07.26 um 2:46 PM schrieb Friedrich Weber: > On 13/07/2026 14:40, Fiona Ebner wrote: >> As reported in the community forum [0] and enterprise support, Windows >> with MBEC and VBS can have issues on certain Intel CPUs, leading to >> guest freezes and 100% CPU usage. Note that the vmx-mbec flag will >> automatically be enabled if both QEMU (since 11.0) and the kernel >> (since 7.0.0-3-pve) support it, but this is incorrect from a machine >> version perspective, since the flag was enabled before. While there > > Should this be "since the flag *not* enabled before"? Yes, good catch! Maybe even "the feature was not available before", since the flag did not even exist yet.