From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE78E64F14
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 11:20:05 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C1A1622C4F
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 11:19:35 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
[94.136.29.106])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id D626922C44
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 11:19:34 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A911341B5A
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 11:19:34 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <8ffb637d-65f1-5478-b407-7b4fa0bb8e93@proxmox.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 11:19:33 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.5.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, h.laimer@proxmox.com
References: <20220131084128.2449-1-h.laimer@proxmox.com>
<7a6a2bb6-2b50-5586-4f4e-667bfc4162b5@proxmox.com>
From: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <7a6a2bb6-2b50-5586-4f4e-667bfc4162b5@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0
AWL 0.137 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A)
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 -
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-manager v2] api: add 'type' parameter to
pool GET endpoint
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 10:20:05 -0000
Am 31.01.22 um 11:11 schrieb Fabian Ebner:
> Am 31.01.22 um 09:41 schrieb Hannes Laimer:
>> Signed-off-by: Hannes Laimer <h.laimer@proxmox.com>
>> ---
>> v2(based on Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>'s feedback):
>> - remove openzv
>> - optimize loops
>>
>> This was asked in a forum post, and it does not interfere with
>> anything else AFAIK.
>>
>> PVE/API2/Pool.pm | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/PVE/API2/Pool.pm b/PVE/API2/Pool.pm
>> index 28c29ab8..ae31addf 100644
>> --- a/PVE/API2/Pool.pm
>> +++ b/PVE/API2/Pool.pm
>> @@ -211,6 +211,11 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method ({
>> type => 'string',
>> format => 'pve-poolid',
>> },
>> + type => {
>> + type => 'string',
>> + enum => [ 'qemu', 'lxc', 'storage' ],
>> + optional => 1,
>> + },
>> },
>> },
>> returns => {
>> @@ -269,27 +274,29 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method ({
>> my $members = [];
>> for my $vmid (sort keys %{$pool_config->{vms}}) {
>> my $vmdata = $idlist->{$vmid};
>> - next if !$vmdata;
>> + next if !$vmdata || defined($param->{type}) && $param->{type} eq $vmdata->{type};
>
> Logic is inverted here, should be ne rather than eq.
>
>> my $entry = PVE::API2Tools::extract_vm_stats($vmid, $vmdata, $rrd);
>> push @$members, $entry;
>> }
>>
>> my $nodename = PVE::INotify::nodename();
>> my $cfg = PVE::Storage::config();
>> - for my $storeid (sort keys %{$pool_config->{storage}}) {
>> - my $scfg = PVE::Storage::storage_config ($cfg, $storeid, 1);
>> - next if !$scfg;
>> -
>> - my $storage_node = $nodename; # prefer local node
>> - if ($scfg->{nodes} && !$scfg->{nodes}->{$storage_node}) {
>> - for my $node (sort keys(%{$scfg->{nodes}})) {
>> - $storage_node = $node;
>> - last;
>> + if (!defined($param->{type}) || $param->{type} eq 'storage') {
>> + for my $storeid (sort keys %{$pool_config->{storage}}) {
>> + my $scfg = PVE::Storage::storage_config ($cfg, $storeid, 1);
>> + next if !$scfg;
>> +
>> + my $storage_node = $nodename; # prefer local node
>> + if ($scfg->{nodes} && !$scfg->{nodes}->{$storage_node}) {
>> + for my $node (sort keys(%{$scfg->{nodes}})) {
>> + $storage_node = $node;
>> + last;
>> + }
>
> Not your code, but this loop could be replaced with a simple:
> $storage_node = (sort keys $scfg->{nodes}->%*)[0];
> You can add a patch for it if you'd like.
Or maybe not, if $scfg->{nodes} can be an empty hash..
>
>> }
>> - }
>>
>> - my $entry = PVE::API2Tools::extract_storage_stats($storeid, $scfg, $storage_node, $rrd);
>> - push @$members, $entry;
>> + my $entry = PVE::API2Tools::extract_storage_stats($storeid, $scfg, $storage_node, $rrd);
>
> Style nit: >100 character line
>
>> + push @$members, $entry;
>> + }
>> }
>>
>> my $res = {
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pve-devel mailing list
> pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
>
>