From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA9331FF172 for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Tue, 1 Apr 2025 10:46:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9ABFA1CD95; Tue, 1 Apr 2025 10:46:26 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <8eb9b052-b016-4a6e-b1bd-702522156f9f@proxmox.com> Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 10:45:52 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird From: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com> To: Prashant Patil <Prashant.Gamepatil@veritas.com>, Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>, Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> References: <PH0PR20MB4520A4201D4560B18A0C830798C82@PH0PR20MB4520.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> <PH0PR20MB4520276B3A7061528854180598DF2@PH0PR20MB4520.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> <PH0PR20MB45209D60E2A2A691D643A3C998DE2@PH0PR20MB4520.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> <9963c93c-29a7-4d20-b282-ec5629d812a8@proxmox.com> <PH0PR20MB4520584B52872E16277A621198A42@PH0PR20MB4520.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> <3c13a721-14c4-41ae-8ad2-b52a2d84bd38@proxmox.com> <PH0PR20MB4520FF39B329114AB45B2ADD98A72@PH0PR20MB4520.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> <766af997-a62a-4dd2-804f-9c018cd7b707@proxmox.com> <PH0PR20MB452084FCE3C6D7DD55BDEBC398A62@PH0PR20MB4520.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> <65b843b1-af29-40fd-807c-3f2e4d03ae94@proxmox.com> <PH0PR20MB45200BE3B210EC8C69046E6698A02@PH0PR20MB4520.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> <2316485c-f24a-4a74-8427-4afeaca86567@proxmox.com> <PH0PR20MB4520E9A4E56E11C9FDC9981598AC2@PH0PR20MB4520.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> <6e1b4e46-ddc6-46a2-bdc3-649a354a3525@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <6e1b4e46-ddc6-46a2-bdc3-649a354a3525@proxmox.com> X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.163 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment KAM_LOTSOFHASH 0.25 Emails with lots of hash-like gibberish RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: Re: [pve-devel] About PVE Backup Integration Guide X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> Cc: Anuradha Joshi <Anuradha.Joshi@veritas.com>, Sudhir Subbarao <Sudhir.Subbarao@veritas.com>, Jason Voneberstein <Jason.vonEberstein@veritas.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com> Am 01.04.25 um 10:07 schrieb Fiona Ebner: > Note there is a v6 of the patch series now [0]. Also available as packages now: http://download.proxmox.com/temp/backup-provider-api-v6/ SHA256SUMS: > 08064b8f20997090e31854711ff6fa99154c8c7894c39da12333c9d3d71e42c6 libpve-common-perl_8.2.9+backupproviderapiv6_all.deb > 43a3d280073685c1327d774223fdbc4fbcf465306f859d47351b4a3366e362b6 libpve-storage-perl_8.3.3+backupproviderapiv6_all.deb > 9ecc30ebf52490552799a7aab4bb64024897446bc7425e8a0242320fd6481eb8 pve-container_5.2.4+backupproviderapiv6_all.deb > 67fc180e59da5538ef591c6fe7a84fe50673aa3fa16428d488ecafa4f5983686 pve-manager_8.3.5+backupproviderapiv6_all.deb > 890c2c21d5e1a974c3e3be01cbb428c24371baf794a4dcabdd101daf7d50ff27 pve-qemu-kvm_9.2.0-2+backupproviderapiv6_amd64.deb > 5349fa5af94d1ed769160a4f7c6acfb180ccf7ac399937b32590c8a0c01a4ae4 qemu-server_8.3.8+backupproviderapiv6_amd64.deb > Am 01.04.25 um 09:02 schrieb Prashant Patil: >> 2. Do we need to implement our own backup provider plugin? Which >> all functions we need to implement? > > Yes. You need to implement all methods, but you can decide which backup > and restore mechanisms you want to implement. One for VMs and one for > containers. I suggest you take a look at the examples for these too: https://lore.proxmox.com/pve-devel/20250331132020.105324-17-f.ebner@proxmox.com/ https://lore.proxmox.com/pve-devel/20250331132020.105324-18-f.ebner@proxmox.com/ Best Regards, Fiona _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel