From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AE8E61E37
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 18:53:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 91F6B21F09
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 18:53:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 387F521EFF
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 18:53:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0701745EDC
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 18:53:14 +0200 (CEST)
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 =?UTF-8?Q?Dominic_J=c3=a4ger?= <d.jaeger@proxmox.com>
References: <20201015100019.311138-1-d.jaeger@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <8becc254-bcc2-9209-077a-3f22b3f35701@proxmox.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 18:53:13 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:82.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/82.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20201015100019.311138-1-d.jaeger@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.123 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH manager] ui: Fix #2827: Add verify SSL
 cert checkbox for ldap
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 16:53:44 -0000

On 15.10.20 12:00, Dominic J=C3=A4ger wrote:
> Because the option is too important to be hidden in CLI.
>=20
> Signed-off-by: Dominic J=C3=A4ger <d.jaeger@proxmox.com>
> ---
> I haven't managed to test this against an LDAP server yet, but the GUI =
elements
> go on and off as I had it in mind and the options in /etc/pve/domains.c=
fg
> change as expected.
>=20
>  www/manager6/dc/AuthEditLDAP.js | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++=

>  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
>=20
>

applied, thanks! Did a s/me/field/ followup though, as overwriting me her=
e could be come surprising.

Also, would this be relevant for AD too?